We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Royal Mail doing all they can to damage themselves?
Comments
-
heathcote123 wrote: »From a customer point of view RM is in a downwards spiral with regard to service & prices. Your view seems to be it's the customers fault. Which is fair enough, and quite typical of public sector thinking.
Over the years I've heard run-ins at a Corporate level with several large companies including Vodaphone. Doesn't stop them being highly profitable. Too big to care about a single customer.0 -
Under the "Law of Intended Consequences" if an organisation announces that it will be putting its prices up in a few months time, but meanwhile will be selling vouchers so that you can buy future services at current prices, this must mean:
1) That they want to encourage a buying boom now
2) That the value of the increased current sales is worth more to them than future sales at the higher price
3) That they have a captive market and are immune from any future competition from rivals or technological change.
Doubtless the Post Office has some highly paid consultants who have advised them of the truth of these assumptions.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Only 5 pre-opened birthday cards this year.
Royal Mail are slipping.0 -
Clifford_Pope wrote: »Under the "Law of Intended Consequences" if an organisation announces that it will be putting its prices up in a few months time, but meanwhile will be selling vouchers so that you can buy future services at current prices, this must mean:
1) That they want to encourage a buying boom now
2) That the value of the increased current sales is worth more to them than future sales at the higher price
3) That they have a captive market and are immune from any future competition from rivals or technological change.
Doubtless the Post Office has some highly paid consultants who have advised them of the truth of these assumptions.
did you miss they are required to by the regulator?0 -
Whats really strange, is that RM are refusing to tell the PO what the new prices are to be (other than standard letters)
As I sell quite a bit of stuff to the states on ebay & the PO don't know what the new airmail prices are to be. So I can't list anything for the next couple of weeks, as I don't want to be out of pocket & its costing me.0 -
The details for international pricing are on the Royal Mail web site.
http://c435158.r58.cf3.rackcdn.com/Royal_Mail_Our_Prices.pdf0 -
Whats really strange, is that RM are refusing to tell the PO what the new prices are to be (other than standard letters)
As I sell quite a bit of stuff to the states on ebay & the PO don't know what the new airmail prices are to be. So I can't list anything for the next couple of weeks, as I don't want to be out of pocket & its costing me.
seriously?
the prices are all over the web
they won't be refusing anything0 -
did you miss they are required to by the regulator?
Obviously yes.
If you are saying the regulator has as much business acumen as the PO, then obviously they deserve each other.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Clifford_Pope wrote: »Obviously yes.
If you are saying the regulator has as much business acumen as the PO, then obviously they deserve each other.
is a regulators duty to ensure the business is profitable?
because its not what RMs reglator has been doing0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

