Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

keggs

Cardew wrote: »

It is a well accepted tenet that in Law, and indeed internet protocols, that if a statement is true it does not constitute libel or abuse.

So in both cases you quote I am guilty of no offence;)

Whose truth are we talking about here Cardew. As you have been found out for telling untruths I doubt that anything you say here now could be classed as truthful.

In my experience people who accuse others of being out of their depth usually are the ones who are themselves out of their depth.

Maz

Cardew wrote: »

It is a well accepted tenet that in Law, and indeed internet protocols, that if a statement is true it does not constitute libel or abuse.

So in both cases you quote I am guilty of no offence;)

The truth according to Cardews' definition presumably.;)

keggs

Maz wrote: »

The truth according to Cardews' definition presumably.;)

I wonder what Carmine would say to Cardew's protestation. I am sure he would have fallen off his perch at that.:rotfl:

I can just about hear his words as well.

Cardew

keggs wrote: »

Whose truth are we talking about here Cardew. As you have been found out for telling untruths I doubt that anything you say here now could be classed as truthful.

What untruths would they be ?

keggs

French & Saunders for starters.

Maz

Cardew wrote: »

It is a well accepted tenet that in Law, and indeed internet protocols, that if a statement is true it does not constitute libel or abuse.

So in both cases you quote I am guilty of no offence;)

Nice to see that you do actually DO have a sense of self deprecating humour! Makes you seem a bit human somehow.

keggs

Maz wrote: »

Nice to see that you do actually DO have a sense of self deprecating humour! Makes you seem a bit human somehow.

Was it bthe wink that caught your eye Maz:D

Cardew

keggs wrote: »

French & Saunders for starters.

The discussion was about UW advertising and I said,

So what are French and Saunders doing on TV most nights?

When my error was pointed out, later that day I posted;

Sorry I thought I had seen French and Saunders on TV; so got that wrong

Is that really the best you can do?

keggs

Cardew wrote: »

The discussion was about UW advertising and I said,


When my error was pointed out, later that day I posted;



Is that really the best you can do?

You constantly assert wrongly that UW customers cannot save on their energy bills. But when this untruth is pointed out to you regularly, you totally ignore it and continue telling the same untruth.

Would it not be a good idea to answer Nigewick's continual question that has been put to you. As I am in the same boat as Nigewick as is every other UW distributor plus carmine and Janinene here we would all appreciate that you retract your untruth.

Cardew

keggs wrote: »

You constantly assert wrongly that UW customer cannot save on their energy bills.

I only assert(repeatedly;)) that UW have just about the highest gas and electricity prices in UK.

That is an absolute fact - the truth.

I have never stated what you allege in the quote above.

So, perhaps you can point out a post where I have ever made that statement.

Please don't bluster, just point out my post.

Or an apology?