Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

1carminestocky · 27 March 2009 at 3:35PM

dacouch wrote: »

Anyway this is a great thread when the other threads on MSE are quiet, I quiet enjoy reading the "banter" on this thread.

Does any one know what the collective pronoun is for a UW Distributer?

I can't believe you still have the brass neck to be not only on here but posting? :eek: :eek:

dacouch · 27 March 2009 at 3:35PM

Cardew wrote: »

A wealth of UW distributors?

lol.

Could it be a Gospel of UW Distributers

dacouch · 27 March 2009 at 3:36PM

1carminestocky wrote: »

I can't believe you still have the brass neck to be not only on here but posting? :eek: :eek:

Why should I not post on here?

1carminestocky · 27 March 2009 at 3:38PM

dacouch wrote: »

I was curious after reading the posts on here and how commited to UW the people are as to whether they would breach MSE rules and PM me.

As you know Quentin we are both on MSE a lot and often agree and sometimes disagree with each other. Which is the beauty of MSE, I don't like people who abuse MSE and tout for business so it was a test (Entrapment if you like). I'm glad to report no one did pm me which impressed me.

I'm not for or against UW but read most of this Thread and it is a great thread so thought I would join in, after all we all like a good discussion

Seriously, I can't stop laughing. You obviously have the memory of a goldfish. :rotfl:

1carminestocky · 27 March 2009 at 3:41PM

dacouch wrote: »

Why should I not post on here?

There's absolutely no rules against it, of course, I was just putting myself in your shoes and imagining how I would deal with such a public embarrassment. You have to admit here (or do you? Who knows whether anything you say is the truth now?) you haven't exactly covered yourself in glory on this thread...

Quentin · 27 March 2009 at 3:41PM

Decado23 wrote: »

This attempted entrapment, which if successful would presumably have been used to discredit an entire company based on the actions of a single person is frankly pathetic.

Thought the rogue reps from uw who come here and break the rules, make false and misleading claims or pose as satisfied customers have already done that.

dacouch · 27 March 2009 at 3:41PM

ohhHHHhhh someone can get pictures off the internet.

So in what way would you own me?

You can tell me later, as I'm off out

1carminestocky · 27 March 2009 at 3:43PM

dacouch wrote: »

ohhHHHhhh someone can get pictures off the internet.

So in what way would you own me?

You can tell me later, as I'm off out

Put it this way, if I was up on a charge and you were the only defence witness, I would ask to be transferred straight to prison and forget about the court case. :rotfl:

Decado23 · 27 March 2009 at 3:49PM

Quentin wrote: »

Thought the rogue reps from uw who come here and break the rules, make false and misleading claims or pose as satisfied customers have already done that.

yes of course, it's perfectly sensible to judge a company based on a small number of individuals who, acting indepentently and in many cases against that companies policy, do something daft.

Interestingly, UW hasn't recently been fined nearly £2mil for mis-selling. But a few people spouting crap on the internet is clearly far worse. yes indeedy.