We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Forum Update
Options
Comments
-
Back on topic, I hope we won't see huge pictures posted on the forums; it really affected threads. I think we shouldn't let pictures more than 500 px.
I brought this up before with the tech team who told me they would fix it. It never happened though.
Surely it can't be that hard to have an auto resize function so they fit to the width of the forum. :undecided0 -
Wow, you people must have seriously big screens.
Even back in 2001 the new fixed layout would have been using only 1024 of the 1600 available horizontal pixels on my laptop computer display. Back in 1995 I got my first 1600x1200 resolution display so this 1024 width stuff looks like pretty ancient stuff to me, even though I know that web designers used to commonly use 800 pixel width and did so myself for one site where that was a design requirement.
Today a new low end laptop computer has a 1600x900 display and even the cheapest external monitors can do that. MSE has some people using old equipment that works fine and is older and has lower resolutions to consider also.
What MSE is trying with a fixed width is pretty much impossible to get right. It's guaranteed to either cause horizontal scrolling trouble or join the sites that annoy people with fixed widths when the graphic designers rule the roost instead of the users. For those who need larger text sizes it'll have even less letters per row than what he's trying to arrange on readability grounds for those who use whatever text size he's assuming people have.
Fortunately Martin is understanding so he's provided the flexible width version that should manage not to annoy anyone other than graphic designers who have to work on the site.
There are even better solutions out there. Wikipedia - a few thousand times as much traffic as here - has done lots of usability studies and has a user interface that allows logged in users to completely reskin the appearance of the site so it looks as they want it to look.
People who happen to have lower resolution display or who use partial width browsers may not even notice an issue and may be completely happy with the fixed width version.0 -
southernscouser wrote: »Surely it can't be that hard to have an auto resize function so they fit to the width of the forum. :undecided0
-
I still say they should add a forum skin menu at the bottom of the page,rather than just hidden away in the user CP0
-
Just got my stretchy screen back - hated the fixed width - I say we vote on whether it stays or not, lets do a poll0
-
CommitedToChange wrote: »Just got my stretchy screen back - hated the fixed width - I say we vote on whether it stays or not, lets do a poll0
-
New is great on my phone but rubbish on my laptop, gone back to stretchy on lappie.0
-
The thing is he does hold all the power, like it or not.
We're only minions.
He would be a fool to ignore opinions.
Anyway he`s given everyone a choice, stay on fixed or go back to stretchy, so there`s no problem at the moment.
The big problem would come if there was no choice.
As I said in an earlier post, the "fixed" is nothing new, that`s how it used to be 10 years ago when the site was in it`s infancy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards