📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Leeds Bradford airport rip off

Options
1101113151626

Comments

  • withabix
    withabix Posts: 9,508 Forumite
    Are these AEs still arguing that the airport drop-off fee is illegal?
    British Ex-pat in British Columbia!
  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    dfh2012 wrote: »
    So if I have to drop someone off because they have to catch a flight from Leeds Bradford and find their charges are excessive, it is so reasonable to then drive and catch a flight from Edinburgh because the charges are lower. It is perfectly reasonable and acceptable as I have the freedom of choice.

    No, you drop them off at the long-stay carpark where they can get a free bus to the terminal. This will cost you nothing (apart from perhaps the extra petrol - let's hope it's not a long way away, say, 2 quid's worth of petrol :rotfl:).
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
  • *max*
    *max* Posts: 3,208 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dfh2012 wrote: »
    Companies will charge whatever they want so if someone asks for 1000000 for a tin of beans, just hand in the money as you have no right to protest.

    The statement that companies can charge whatever they want does not hold true.

    Dear lord....

    Yes, the company has the right to charge 10000000 for a tin of beans. they can. They are allowed. It is legal.

    The customer, however, can chose not to buy them at that price (= has the right to protest) and look elsewhere.

    It's like the twilight zone here today...
  • An individual company wanting to advertise it's beans for sale at £1m is perfectly within the law ... Finding a buyer at any of these prices is the hard part, but it doesn't stop them ...
    ... herding you in to the airport carpark and selling you their beans when you were only there to drop someone off ? No Siree - what would however stop them is if some public spirited individuals exhibiting terrier-like qualities often enough bit them where their beans don't reach ;)
  • *max*
    *max* Posts: 3,208 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dfh2012 wrote: »
    So far I have not heard of a single instance when someone has been charged 1000000 for a tin of beans.

    Until then the statement that companies can charge whatever they want does not hold true.

    So because something hasn't happened, it means it can't?

    Wow...so if you haven't died yet, it means you cannot die! You have just invented eternal life! :T
  • Yes, now you mention it dfh2012, I think you are absolutely correct. We are all converted by your convincing argument.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    edited 8 January 2012 at 5:26PM
    dfh2012 wrote: »
    So far I have not heard of a single instance when someone has been charged 1000000 for a tin of beans.

    Until then the statement that companies can charge whatever they want does not hold true.

    I think you miss the point that the law's not quantitative on issues like this. Your example of 1 million pounds is, of course, ridiculous. But where would you draw the line? Would you accept that companies can charge £2? Or £1? Seems a lot for a tin of beans but I bet that someone's paid that before.

    You see, there's no difference (in terms of the law's pertinence to this issue) between £1 and £1M. The fact remains that the company is charging what they like. To argue that just because you've not seen a ridiculously inflated price (who has?) that pricing isn't flexible is fallacious.
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
  • *max* wrote: »
    Wow...so if you haven't died yet, it means you cannot die! You have just invented eternal life! :T

    I plan to live forever - so far so good.

    Although dealing with the children in this thread has taken off about 5 years.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    dfh2012 wrote: »
    It hasn't happened so far because companies know they cannot charge whatever they want and get away with it.

    And on that we all agree.
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
  • I think you miss the point that the law's not quantitative on issues like this. Your examples of 1 million and now 10 million pounds are, of course, ridiculous. But where would you draw the line? Would you accept that companies can charge £2? Or £1? Seems a lot for a tin of beans but I bet that someone's paid that before.

    You see, there's no difference (in terms of the law's pertinence to this issue) between £1 and £1M. The fact remains that the company is charging what they like. To argue that just because you've not seen a ridiculously inflated price (who has?) that pricing isn't flexible is fallacious.

    Evidently they were perfectly happy with my £1m bath example I provided a link to. But £1m for a tin of beans does seem a bit far fetched!

    I've got 2 of those baths in my house:cool:
    Thinking critically since 1996....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.