The Work Programme New Thread

Denning.

john539 wrote: »

All public organisations have a duty of care to the public.

Not really, certainly not to provide facilities.

john539

Denning. wrote: »

Not really, certainly not to provide facilities.

How would you know ?

What situations & circumstances are we talking about, or are you just clueless ?

Denning.

john539 wrote: »

How would you know ?

What situations & circumstances are we talking about, or are you just clueless ?

You assert there is a duty of care, prove it.

Or are you just clueless?

Chester666666

Denning. wrote: »

What duty of care do the JC have to claimants?

No harm such as forcing people to go a distance they don't need to to use a toilet which includes people with medical issues, such as the ones who had to get an MP involved
Plus a duty if care means not having etc

Chester666666

john539 wrote: »

All public organisations have a duty of care to the public.

Exactly
This is what I am referring to

donnajunkie

Chester666666 wrote: »

So to be wary of the few everyone must be penalised?

no its to protect from what is likely to happen from happening.

Chester666666

donnajunkie wrote: »

no its to protect from what is likely to happen from happening.

You mean jobcentre staff must be protected from a toilet use - they must be in such terrible danger every time someone dares even look at a toilet then

red_devil

I just left the wp. I asked for my exit report nobody sent it out which dosent suprise me. I was told i could have a copy.

Chester666666

red_devil wrote: »

I just left the wp. I asked for my exit report nobody sent it out which dosent suprise me. I was told i could have a copy.

You can but you can also collect it from your WP folk and they have to give you a copy

donnajunkie

Chester666666 wrote: »

You mean jobcentre staff must be protected from a toilet use - they must be in such terrible danger every time someone dares even look at a toilet then

it would be very tempting for some to assault a jc adviser they hate. there could be no witnesses and there wont be any cameras obviously. also they dont want the cost of paying someone to make repairs due to vandalism.