We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Autumn Budget Statement: Benefits to rise 5.2% with inflation

Options
191011121315»

Comments

  • KxMx
    KxMx Posts: 11,120 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Aslyum seekers do not have access to official public funds such as benefits. But anyone who thinks they do not get any money ie from local charities/funds/initiaves is quite naive. It is also quite possible for these charities to receive grants/funding from the Government/ Gov schemes/ local or county councils. They can't live on and in fresh air until their case is heard after all, they have to eat, be clothed etc. So they may not get "official" funds but they are financially supported to a degree (especially when there are children).
  • KxMx wrote: »
    Aslyum seekers do not have access to official public funds such as benefits. But anyone who thinks they do not get any money ie from local charities/funds/initiaves is quite naive. It is also quite possible for these charities to receive grants/funding from the Government/ Gov schemes/ local or county councils. They can't live on and in fresh air until their case is heard after all, they have to eat, be clothed etc. So they may not get "official" funds but they are financially supported to a degree (especially when there are children).

    They do get official funds. From NASS (funded by the Home Office). It's 70% of income support rates.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • Sixer
    Sixer Posts: 1,087 Forumite
    They do get official funds. From NASS (funded by the Home Office). It's 70% of income support rates.

    But to be fair, doesn't NASS also pay utility bills as well as rent? I thought that's why the rates are lower. Presumably such people can't get accounts with the utility companies? I'd always assumed that's why it was.

    (PS: not an anti-asylum post: fully paid up devotee of the Refugee Council, me).
  • Oh and we only have a 37 inch TV in the front room and a 32 inch in the bedroom.[/QUOTE]

    it beats my 9 inch in the bedroom!!!.:D
  • cit_k
    cit_k Posts: 24,812 Forumite
    dktreesea wrote: »
    What do you mean by "no choice?" Of course people have a choice. I can understand why people think of those on JSA as work shy. If someone was laid off, why can't they work for themselves? Why do they have to sit around, on JSA, forever and a day, crying "Woe is me! No one will give me a job!" How helpless and pathetic is that?

    There are heaps of things people can do that don't cost a lot - presumably they have some redundancy money if they have been laid off? or holiday pay/ Some kind of lump sum? - to set up. Telesales, gardening, window cleaning, cleaning cars, delivering leaflets, selling stuff at the market, dog walking, selling things on Ebay, Amazon, some other online site. I'm sick of people on the jsa who only want the same kind of job that they used to do and won't take charge of their own lives and create their own jobs.

    Perhaps when you open your mind, and stop thinking in such limited terms, you might stop writing such garbage.

    Do you seriously think running a business is something everyone is capable of?
    Do you seriously think everyone on JSA is only applying for their old type of job?

    The fact you came out with such a stupid statement shows you do not even understand the basics of the JSA regime.
    [greenhighlight]but it matters when the most senior politician in the land is happy to use language and examples that are simply not true.
    [/greenhighlight][redtitle]
    The impact of this is to stigmatise people on benefits,
    and we should be deeply worried about that
    [/redtitle](house of lords debate, talking about Cameron)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.