breach of compromise agreement by employer.

KiKi

Are they actually sending a revised CA, or just a letter backing up the original version? If the latter, I really don't see how it changes the original position.

skintandscared_2

Milkshock wrote: »

a revised ca that makes it clear that they were in breach of the agreement, yes.

the next logical step in that case would be for them to make some kind of payment to me as their position becomes very questionable.

if they were going to fight me all the way they wouldnt agree to a letter of assuarance.

in case the same thing happened again.

:rotfl::rotfl: Absolutely 100% no way on earth would this ever happen. A company is not going to voluntarily hand you a document admitting they have breached an agreement! They wouldn't do it even if they HAD. The best you will get is their assurance that it will not happen again.

Milkshock

---

Milkshock

---

ILW

You seem to be clutching at straws by making all sorts of assumptions. They are not going to put anything in writing that gives you the opportunity to sue them.

KiKi

So it's a letter of clarification. This is not a new CA, IMO.

KiKi

ILW

Milkshock wrote: »

depends on what your view of the original position is?

to me it clarifies the original position yes.

this is what it will say:

the compromise agreement as it currently stands, and has always stood, since the date of its commencement, allows no room for any further dissemination of information about Milkshock to any prospective employer other than the agreed reference.

upon verbal or written request by any future employer the organisation shall deny any knowledge of any allegations, claims or issues (including formal disciplinary action, informal action or the existence of any compromise agreement ) relating to Milkshock's employment with the organisation that are not strictly in line with the terms and text of the agreed reference.

They will not say that are "going to deny any knowledge". They may say they will neither confirm or deny. Totally different.

Milkshock

---

Milkshock

---

skintandscared_2

Milkshock wrote: »

depends on what your view of the original position is?

to me it clarifies the original position yes.

this is what it will say:

the compromise agreement as it currently stands, and has always stood, since the date of its commencement, allows no room for any further dissemination of information about Milkshock to any prospective employer other than the agreed reference.

upon verbal or written request by any future employer the organisation shall deny any knowledge of any allegations, claims or issues (including formal disciplinary action, informal action or the existence of any compromise agreement ) relating to Milkshock's employment with the organisation that are not strictly in line with the terms and text of the agreed reference.

In your dreams. No lawyer would write or agree to the signing of this wording. Your time and energy would be much better spent looking for a new job. Preferably not in HR.