breach of compromise agreement by employer.

Milkshock

---

Milkshock

---

mildred1978

Milkshock wrote: »

im not taking them to court anyway, not as long as they give me some form of payout which i think they will.

im saying there will be no possible loopholes for them in the future, after this.

anyway it will be retrospective as the letter will begin:

the compromise agreement as it currently stands, and has always stood

Can't wait to see it.

dandelionclock30

You might have such a large payout that you can retire so you wont have to worry about working again!

Cheeky_Monkey

I really don't get it. Surely the OP's ex-employer cannot possibly be so stupid as to provide the OP with a letter of assurance including the 2nd paragraph as demanded by the OP!

Wouldn't they be giving the OP the ammunition to shoot them with if they confirm in writing that their understanding of the terms of the CA had always been that they were not permitted to deviate from the original reference in any circumstances?

Milkshock

---

skintandscared_2

Milkshock wrote: »

ok there were 2 disciplinary issues, one pending before i left.

the first disciplinary was at a works social event where i ended up throwing a drink twice over a work colleague who worked in HR. for that i received a written warning.

a re-organisation then occured where my post was deleted - i felt i was being picked on because of my disciplinary and i then got nailed before i left for contacting one of the people involved at the works event that i was not supposed to - emailing her and bad mouthing several people in HR - where i used to work before the transfer.

that was the pending disciplinary.

i got out via a CA which the employer agreed to.

When you say you "got out", do you mean you resigned before the 2nd disciplinary, or did they "suggest" you might want to look around for another job? Who first suggested the CA? Looks like it was a quicker and easier option than going through the formality of sacking you? All I'm trying to ascertain is why you believe you have such a strong position against your former company here, considering your behaviour that led to the CA in the first place.

Your former employer are not in a position to lie about specific questions asked to them. By what power do you believe you can insist a company lie for you??! I just gave the scenario to my partner if you were an employer, received an okay reference for an applicant then got a tip off that they were trouble, and the original referee responded "no comment" to that tip off, what would you think? He immediately said he would assume the tip off is true. I interview as part of my job and I would assume that too.

This entire situation is down to (a) your disgraceful behaviour (especially for someone who works in HR!!!) and (b) the person who you clearly upset enough for them to rat on you.

Milkshock

---

Milkshock

---

dandelionclock30

Yes your likley to get a massive payout arent you?