[CLOSED] Samsung 28'' Pure Flat Widescreen With Integrated Freeview TV + Cabinet £33

blueghost

amit_1 wrote:

how did u get this no 1 else got this e-mail yet

it's just a copy of the kodak email, see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/01/31/kodak_surrenders/ for the original

rogue_element

What was that gmail.com address we should email again? I cannot find it??? (tried the search)

jooble

Went through the same as everyone else with this,sent them a complaint
and got a polite but firm "your not getting the TV".10 mins later I got
a Check out these great deals E-mail.10 out of 10 for cheek or what...

ACID

amit_1 wrote:

how did u get this no 1 else got this e-mail yet

read mate he's makign it up

dont just think you wil get the item by readign one psot

open your eyes

amit_1

what an a*s hole making up fake things ban him

rogerramjet

http://www.ecominfo.net/arts/econtracts_warchus.htm

maybe of interest to people

remember when reading though that Ebuyers Terms and Conditions 1.2 and 1.3 clearly state the acceptance e-mail It is at this point that a binding legal contract is created and any contract is subject to these Terms and Conditions

which is a different case than that in the article

GASPPM

rogerramjet wrote:

http://www.ecominfo.net/arts/econtracts_warchus.htm

maybe of interest to people

remember when reading though that Ebuyers Terms and Conditions 1.2 and 1.3 clearly state the acceptance e-mail It is at this point that a binding legal contract is created and any contract is subject to these Terms and Conditions

which is a different case than that in the article

Why dont one of Us Email this guy and see if he can help, maybe get a Price for his time and we all split the cost.

John Warchus IT & E-Commerce Partner
Shadbolt & Co
Tel: 01737 226277
john_warchus@shadboltlaw.co.uk
https://www.shadboltlaw.co.uk

The TV would be nice but TBH I am more wanting to teach Ebuyer a Lesson as they cant go around shouting the Odds and treating there Customer base like !!!!!!

shrek101

Ebuyer couldnt give a monkey's about there customer's even with the incident with the TV.

rogerramjet

The price advertised of £28.08 excl vat represented in law an “Invitation to treat” It was not an offer to sell the Television.

It was obvious to all concerned that the figure given was incorrect. Our Terms and Conditions permit us to decline to supply any particular item. In this instance no contract was made and this company has no liability to you

Hummm....I've a few other orders on the go with them, before I bought my tv which they have now stolen....I wonder if they will make me honour my outstanding purchases if I tell them I want to cancel them as they are yet to be delivered and their email clearly states their Terms and conditions mean no contract is made even when they have taken the money

brown_ambassador

GASPPM wrote:

Why dont one of Us Email this guy and see if he can help, maybe get a Price for his time and we all split the cost.

John Warchus IT & E-Commerce Partner
Shadbolt & Co
Tel: 01737 226277
john_warchus@shadboltlaw.co.uk
https://www.shadboltlaw.co.uk

The TV would be nice but TBH I am more wanting to teach Ebuyer a Lesson as they cant go around shouting the Odds and treating there Customer base like !!!!!!

I was speaking to my solicitor today actually and ran the idea past him and his opinion was if it was a business->business transaction ebuyer might get their shoddy T&Cs through, but consumers are usually better protected (he couldn't officially comment as he hadn't looked at it all in depth, just a passing chat).

I really feel them taking the payment sealed their fate and their dodgy T*Cs wouldn't hold up in court. The only risk is if the court decides it is a genuine pricing error and throws it out.

If someone has the time and inclination to do it I think it would be a fantastic idea to take them to court and I for one would throw in some cash.