Harder to rewrite history than you think Bulls.

peakoil_2

geneer wrote: »

Well apparently pimps you go mental, swarm the board en mass,
making outlandish claims, launch incoherent laughable "counter arguments" and ultimately spit the dummy engaging in foaming personal attacks and starting multiple meaningless threads.

Exquisite.

can you not see that this is also what you do?

lack of self-awareness is breathtaking! :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

ess0two

geneer wrote: »

Well apparently pimps you go mental, swarm the board en mass,
making outlandish claims, launch incoherent laughable "counter arguments" and ultimately spit the dummy engaging in foaming personal attacks and starting multiple meaningless threads.

Exquisite.

Like Devons just done @ post 148

Cleaver

Rinoa wrote: »

Geneer is so proud of this thread he's actually gone over to CC to tell them all about it.

http://www.creditcrunch.co.uk/forum/topic/10039-jonathan-davis-has-the-last-laugh/

Osessed or what?

I always find the same arguements over and over on here a bit worrying, but then when you find that the same people are having the same debates about the same thing using the same usernames on multiple forums... well, it's even more worrying.

Maybe I'm alone on this one though, as this is the only forum on the entire interweb I post on. Do lots of people on here also have the conversations with the same people on other sites?

Cleaver

Graham_Devon wrote: »

You write like chucky.

You have started with the "idiots" line like chucky.

You start sentences with "ha ha" like chucky.

You call people clowns like chucky.

You have a problem with me, like chucky. You have a problem with loughton_monkey, like chucky. You have a problem with geener, like chucky.

You claim you don't know what a bull or bear is, but then it appears you know what goes on on all the other forums surrounding house prices.

So I'm just wondering, why you dropped the chucky username? You may remember I'd figured you out the minute you started posting here.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3350622

Only difference then is you at least attempted grammar and punctuation. You now appear to have changed your writing style since your first post here.

Ahh, I did think the posting style was familiar but couldn't place it. Well done GD. Me and you should set up an internet forum detective agency. Think we'd get much business?

Graham_Devon

Cleaver wrote: »

Ahh, I did think the posting style was familiar but couldn't place it. Well done GD. Me and you should set up an internet forum detective agency. Think we'd get much business?

I fear we'd be out of business once we'd linked the 10 or so obsessives running from board to board in a onemanupmanship contest.

I had to have a look on CC earlier. Think I ended up in the wrong place, which had me a bit baffled, but got there in the end. It's very much like here. About 5 of them saying "but you said" with "no I didn't, I said" in response....

Same poster then visits HPC to suggest the same poster said something, only for the poster to arrive and claim he didn't and quote what was said. Then they arrive at MSE...."HA, this poster said"....and so on.

Once every forum has been visited with the same misinformation posted, the "victim" of this misinformation then starts a new thread, doesn't matter what it is, could be that the nasty poster has a mole on his forehead, so ha ha, he's got a penis on his head. Every forum has to listen to this, until the "victim" proclaims that the clown poster wet themselves in 1982. Of course, in 1982, the now "victim" was 7 months old....but it's hilarious that he wet himself.

Ok, I'm making things up. But its not too far off the mark.

I have no idea what I just typed really. I just carried on typing in my own weird bubble.

peakoil_2

Graham_Devon wrote: »

I fear we'd be out of business once we'd linked the 10 or so obsessives running from board to board in a onemanupmanship contest.

I had to have a look on CC earlier. Think I ended up in the wrong place, which had me a bit baffled, but got there in the end. It's very much like here. About 5 of them saying "but you said" with "no I didn't, I said" in response....

Same poster then visits HPC to suggest the same poster said something, only for the poster to arrive and claim he didn't and quote what was said. Then they arrive at MSE...."HA, this poster said"....and so on.

Once every forum has been visited with the same misinformation posted, the "victim" of this misinformation then starts a new thread, doesn't matter what it is, could be that the nasty poster has a mole on his forehead, so ha ha, he's got a penis on his head. Every forum has to listen to this, until the "victim" proclaims that the clown poster wet themselves in 1982. Of course, in 1982, the now "victim" was 7 months old....but it's hilarious that he wet himself.

Ok, I'm making things up. But its not too far off the mark.

I have no idea what I just typed really. I just carried on typing in my own weird bubble.

spot on GD. weirdo's aren't they the way they spend so much time on an internet forum going over and over the same arguments tima after time while their lives slowly ebb away, their love ones neglected. sad aren't they?

Heyman_2

geneer wrote: »

I have to agree. This particular "argument" and its related inaccurate memes has been tedious for quite some time.

I'm sure that you must take some comfort in the supply of clear undeniable evidence that should, really, once and for all discredit the same tedious arguments.

Presumably, given how bored you are with the arguments,
you will in future seek to close it off by reminding said posters of this thread.

Unlike you I'm not remotely interested in the minutiae of HPC commentator history, but it appears to be your bread and butter, along with the usual smug wordy nonsense such as the above - unfortunately for the rest of us you seem to be quite prolific in barfing all over the front page of the board. Pity.

Still, you seem quite happy with yourself so I guess that's something.

peakoil_2

Heyman wrote: »

Unlike you I'm not remotely interested in the minutiae of HPC commentator history, but it appears to be your bread and butter, along with the usual smug wordy nonsense such as the above - unfortunately for the rest of us you seem to be quite prolific in barfing all over the front page of the board. Pity.

Still, you seem quite happy with yourself so I guess that's something.

one of the best summing up posts I have ever seen. nailed geneer to a T.

puty the mods are so weak on this board that he is allowed to continue to vomit his dissappointment over everyone from his mum's backbedroom.

geneer

Heyman wrote: »

Unlike you I'm not remotely interested in the minutiae of HPC commentator history

Yet here you are whining on and on about it.

Heyman wrote: »

along with the usual smug wordy nonsense such as the above

Heyman went to the school of hard knocks yeah.
University of life maybe.
Read a book mate.

Heyman wrote: »

unfortunately for the rest of us you seem to be quite prolific in barfing all over the front page of the board. Pity.

Yeah. Just me. Yawn.

Heyman wrote: »

Still, you seem quite happy with yourself so I guess that's something.

Yes indeed. You should try "happy" Heyman.
It tastes better than bitter.

Heyman_2

geneer wrote: »

Yet here you are whining on and on about it.

Two posts isn't whining on and on. Your 100 posts from yesterday is on the other hand, definitely whining on and on.

geneer wrote: »

Heyman went to the school of hard knocks yeah.
University of life maybe.
Read a book mate.

Yeah. Just me. Yawn.

Yes indeed. You should try "happy" Heyman.
It tastes better than bitter.

Awww, well you don't seem a very happy bunny tonight. Never mind, tomorrow is another day to hose down the front page of the forum in the name of not much at all, so chin up :j