Parking Eye Court Action

Sirdan

smithy2121 wrote: »

Sorry guys, I stopped commenting on both forums as I was told that it was making me look like a fake, and also not much more to report. The case is ongoing with the help of Alexis.

To the person who asked, I study Accounting at BPP in Boulton House for my CIMA exams. If you had read everything I had said I have made it quite clear I knew I had to pay £5 to park in the car park, but presumed I had to pay the guy who had always collected my money, and wasn't there to pay. Maybe naive on my part but I had done the same parking there many times.

There is nothing stopping anyone ringing Northampton court and asking them what the court fee is. I have done this and was told that £15 is correct, I can only go off this information.

Coupon-mad, Alexis KNOWS i am not a 'stooge' as you nicely put it. He has seen all the paperwork and I have proved who I am.

If the court has told you wrong ,that doesn't change the FACT that MCOL auto generates the correct fee which is not £15, this makes the claim suspect.
There is a similar recent claim posted on Pepipoo by a PPC for less than £300 which shows the correct fee of £25.
This anomaly will obviously make some people (including me) somewhat sceptical. Don't take it personally , but that fact remains that your N1 is inexplicably wrong , as is your MCOL image posted on the other place.

smithy2121

I am not taking it personally, when everybody started talking about the fee being wrong the advice was to ring the court and check it is correct. I did this and they said that £15 is how much the court charges. Not much else I can do regarding that is there? If it is the case and it is wrong then I am sure the judge will have something to say about that (if we ever get that far).

Oopsadaisy

The bloke tells his story and all the conspiracy theorists and amateur detectives rush to prove he's a troll.

Look up there quick....on the grassy knoll.

Sirdan

Oopsadaisy wrote: »

The bloke tells his story and all the conspiracy theorists and amateur detectives rush to prove he's a troll.

Look up there quick....on the grassy knoll.

I'm not rushing to prove anything ..but it is decidely odd isn't it ?

I am keen to know how the automated system has varied the fee in this case ..doesn't make it a fake / troll case ..just a question mark that could do with an answer.

torontoboy45

so the case is due to be heard at northampton co.court.

unless the judge decides to hear the case in camera nobody will object to my being there.

I'm not a million miles away from this town so,being the good little law-abiding torontoboy that I am and never having seen the inside of a courtroom, I'd be grateful for any tips on court attendance.

and smithy2121 could pm me the details.

if I can make it I will; it could be the only game in town on the day, but what's the betting that a 'no-show' will allow the plaintiff to win ?

AlexisV

Northampton is the clearing centre for all online claims. It isn't going to be heard there I'm afraid.

Sirdan

AlexisV wrote: »

Northampton is the clearing centre for all online claims. It isn't going to be heard there I'm afraid.

It's not Oldham is it ?! :rotfl:

torontoboy45

AlexisV wrote: »

Northampton is the clearing centre for all online claims. It isn't going to be heard there I'm afraid.

that's a shame. I was hoping clear up smithy's troll status, one way or the other.

maybe smithy could come back to us after the hearing and post the verdict (with scanned corroborative evidence, of course).

smithy2121

I will come back on here one way or the other and let you know what happens. I have more documents now but have been advised to keep things off the forums. Once the case is over I should be able to put a few things on. Hopefully it won't even get to court, I don't really want to have to take a day off work!

halibut2209

I hope that if it does go to court, you'll let us know so we can come and support you