We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Estate agent speak - the translation

anoneemouse
Posts: 166 Forumite
I'm having a bit of a look round to see if I can find a better house. It has been quite some time since I got my current one.
I've only just started - but realised that estate agents obviously still speak a different language to the rest of us.
So far:
- Our costs to sell your place are 1.5% = We deliberately forgot to mention that there is VAT on top of that, so add another 20% onto the cost we just told you
- No photo of the front of the house provided = There's something wrong with the front of the house and we don't want you to see it until you turn up (eg no front garden shown means there isnt a front garden - even though its a bungalow and bungalows ALWAYS have front gardens)
- Some very "creative" descriptions for a room.
- Not mentioning that the back garden isnt actually a "proper" back garden - ie it had a fence enclosing it and clearly belonged to the house concerned = the house was built on a steep hill and the so-called back garden is largely a bit of scrap land the builder threw in on top of a very very tiny indeed "proper" back garden, because he couldnt think of any way to build anything else on it, but most of the so-called back garden is far too steep for the owner to be able to do anything with it
- Tucked away = Probably means the front garden is missing and access is difficult, because the house is down some sort of alleyway and built on a bit of scrap land or someone else's back garden.
That's what I've put in my "dictionary of estate agent speak" so far. To save me wasting any more time/energy on visiting houses that simply arent good enough for anyone - has anyone else got further examples of "estate agent speak" to bring me back up to speed on the language they use? Misleading descriptions of houses you've actually inspected would also be useful.
I've only just started - but realised that estate agents obviously still speak a different language to the rest of us.
So far:
- Our costs to sell your place are 1.5% = We deliberately forgot to mention that there is VAT on top of that, so add another 20% onto the cost we just told you
- No photo of the front of the house provided = There's something wrong with the front of the house and we don't want you to see it until you turn up (eg no front garden shown means there isnt a front garden - even though its a bungalow and bungalows ALWAYS have front gardens)
- Some very "creative" descriptions for a room.
- Not mentioning that the back garden isnt actually a "proper" back garden - ie it had a fence enclosing it and clearly belonged to the house concerned = the house was built on a steep hill and the so-called back garden is largely a bit of scrap land the builder threw in on top of a very very tiny indeed "proper" back garden, because he couldnt think of any way to build anything else on it, but most of the so-called back garden is far too steep for the owner to be able to do anything with it
- Tucked away = Probably means the front garden is missing and access is difficult, because the house is down some sort of alleyway and built on a bit of scrap land or someone else's back garden.
That's what I've put in my "dictionary of estate agent speak" so far. To save me wasting any more time/energy on visiting houses that simply arent good enough for anyone - has anyone else got further examples of "estate agent speak" to bring me back up to speed on the language they use? Misleading descriptions of houses you've actually inspected would also be useful.
0
Comments
-
From recent experience
Needs TLC
Is a full blown project probably needing rewiring, new boiler, windows, new kitchen and bathroom and then decorating.
tlc to me means a good old clean and redecorate.
Deceptively spacious
Looks really grotty from the outside and the only way to entice you in.
Has potential
is a wreck needing more than TLCMortgage free as of 10/02/2015. Every brick and blade of grass belongs to meeeee. :j0 -
You are adding to my vocabulary - thank you.
I've realised "of interest to builders" = no-one in their right mind would want it. Maybe it even needs knocking down and start afresh.
Houses there costing a lot less than equivalent ones in other areas = Stay inside your house and double-lock it (the area is that bad).
Houses there costing a lot more than other areas = It's my sort of area, but I probably can't afford it.
Any more "translations" please?0 -
They probably didnt mention the VAT as their fee as its not their fee is it?
Fairs fair!I am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Hello Mr Estate Agent (as I assume you are one).
I thought that if I point out to the estate agent concerned that it was a bit "misleading" to say that 1.5% is their selling fee and not mention VAT that they would start playing with words and say that "We told you 1.5% is our fee and that is accurate" and ignore the fact that the question the customer is asking them would perhaps be more accurately phrased as "What costs would I be charged for selling my house through you?". At that point then they would have to admit that VAT came on top of their quoted figure and stop accidentally-on-purpose forgetting to mention that.
So, that means that when I ask an estate agent their fee that I have to be equally "careful" in how I phrase my question - so that they answer the question, rather than take advantage of the exact wording of the question.
In that case then, I had better phrase the question as "What will be the FULL costs of selling my house through you?", then they cant duck out of answering the question properly by "misunderstanding" it.
What other questions do I need to phrase very "carefully" in order to avoid them answering them with anything but "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth" please?0 -
If an agent does something as daft as not putting a photo of the front on the particulars, they shouldn't be in business. The first thing you will see when you go to the property is whatever they've desperately tried to avoid showing you!I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
-
If an EA says that their fee is 1.5% with no mention of VAT it does not seem unreasonable to assume that is the gross figure. On a 200k house I would get the solicitor to pay them 3000. Being VAT registered they would put this through their books as 2500 +VAT. Would they chase the difference of a few hundred pounds?0
-
Corporate Client = Repo
No Upper Chain - 3 bed or larger = repo
No Upper Chain - 1 or 2 bed = Buy-to-let repo
No Upper Chain and patterned carpets = previous owner now dead - or in a home
Reduced for Quick Sale = will be repossessed next month
Estate Agents For Some Reaon Seem To Think That They Need To Capitalise Words and Phrases Where It Is Simply Not Required
In Our Opinion = In the agents/owners opinion - but no one elsesUnless it is damaged or discontinued - ignore any discount of over 25%0 -
Paul_the_Painter wrote: »Corporate Client = Repo
No Upper Chain - 3 bed or larger = repo
No Upper Chain - 1 or 2 bed = Buy-to-let repo
No Upper Chain and patterned carpets = previous owner now dead - or in a home
Reduced for Quick Sale = will be repossessed next month
Estate Agents For Some Reaon Seem To Think That They Need To Capitalise Words and Phrases Where It Is Simply Not Required
In Our Opinion = In the agents/owners opinion - but no one elses
Bit more added to my "vocabulary". Thank you.
I hadn't realised "no upper chain" might mean repo. I assumed all repossessed houses went through auctions.
Good to hear what "reduced for quick sale" means. I suppose one other possibility is "We're getting divorced and we need to share out the assets quickly"??
I've realised how to tell from photos that the house was owned by an old person - hence the owner is dead or in a home. Old-fashioned wallpaper, old-fashioned fire, old-fashioned kitchen, gravel instead of grass in the garden, handrails in the garden. I'll add patterned carpets to the list.0 -
this is a useful thread! i shall be checking back to see what else is added0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards