We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Signing On
Comments
-
So because JC+ staff are treated like crap by the DWP means that other people do as well?Most Job Centres are now open for signing from 08:30-16:50 hrs Mon-Fri plus some on Saturdays too because, such is demand, they've had to open longer to create more signing on appointments.
Doesn't sound like much, but that's an extra 2-3 hours a week that Job Centre staff are expected to work and not be paid for. So I doubt the OP will get far with his "woe is me" routine.
That'll help things!
I don't know if my JC is open those hours; if they were it might help.0 -
It was a direct quote from a Monty Python sketch.ghost_whistler wrote: »On what grounds do you base that massive generalisation? Do you know all the 'kids of today', or are yuou more comfortabel sitting behind yoru keyboard insulting whole swathes of society?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo
For your further education/enlightenment.0 -
richpoortyke wrote: »If they say no then i would visit the library (if its open) or combine the trip with something else. Visit a friend/relative or do some shopping. h
Which is exactly what most of us have been suggesting for many hours, only to be told that he doesn't want to do it!0 -
ghost_whistler wrote: »On what grounds do you base that massive generalisation? Do you know all the 'kids of today', or are yuou more comfortabel sitting behind yoru keyboard insulting whole swathes of society?
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
BUt that isn't what I said, now is it. I even gave you the direct quote and still you refuse to read.Oldernotwiser wrote: »Which is exactly what most of us have been suggesting for many hours, only to be told that he doesn't want to do it!0 -
I do read but I made the rash assumption that you were capable of learning.ghost_whistler wrote: »I haven't asked for a car, it wouldn't be much use because as i said - (you don't read do you) I don't drive. A decent rate of benefit would be more than £65, don't ask me for an exact amount, but since food and travel and clothes and everything costs the same whether you are working or not it needs to be nearer the NMW than not. Britain has one of the lowest benefit rates in europe.
The idea that people won't work if they received more in benefits is just a nonsense. People will work if that work is worthwhile and needs doing and treats them properly. Why else should people work? So they can profit the banksters and the landed gentry? Tell them to clean their own moats!
Expecting people to walk 8 miles to sign on is as ridiculous as your portrayal of my asking that the jobcentre should accomadate their customer's needs. Why shouldn't they? If someone has transport issues, the nature of their income won't change that. If I can't get to the jobcentre at whatever am because the buses aren't running at that time then why is that my fault?
I can assure you I and many other people would not work, if it were not neccesary, I in fact have not worked for five years, unfortunately, unlike you, I do not receive free money, if I could I can assure you a few hours walk once a fortnight for £130 would appear very attractive.0 -
I have not worked since 2004 and if I had to give a whole day up to get £65 extra a week I would do, that is still slightly more than minimum wage.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
ghost_whistler wrote: »T
T A decent rate of benefit would be more than £65, don't ask me for an exact amount, but since food and travel and clothes and everything costs the same whether you are working or not it needs to be nearer the NMW than not. Britain has one of the lowest benefit rates in europe.
Because the UK has a separate benefit to pay for housing and property taxes, unlike many other countries where these have to be paid out of the unemployment benefit.
I just love the idea that we should pay JSA at the same amount as NMW - it's one of the funniest things I've hard for ages!0 -
seven-day-weekend wrote: »I have not worked since 2004 and if I had to give a whole day up to get £65 extra a week I would do, that is still slightly more than minimum wage.
Considerably more, allowing for a 7 hour day and paying tax/NICs.0 -
I said CLOSER to the NMW. Again, read.Oldernotwiser wrote: »Because the UK has a separate benefit to pay for housing and property taxes, unlike many other countries where these have to be paid out of the unemployment benefit.
I just love the idea that we should pay JSA at the same amount as NMW - it's one of the funniest things I've hard for ages!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
