Apoca parking fine Luton Airport info needed please

Jamie_Carter

pogofish wrote: »

So just remind us what part of SCAM is wrong?

Or better still prove it - You have had plenty of time to come-up with something irrefutable, no?

You still haven't explained why you brought Parking Eye up???

If there is a possibility of it being legal in this case, then it wouldn't be a scam.

Read my posts....I raised a question, and didn't state a fact.

Stroma

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

Still talking about bylaws???

So that's your answer then, just proves the point that you have no knowledge of this at all. Your reply just underlines the fact that you are just trolling on here and serve no useful purpose. Kinda like all of your drivel in your posts.

Jamie_Carter

This only took 2 mins to find:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98406/fact-sheet-part3.pdf

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/consumer_e/consumer_cars_and_other_vehicles_e/consumer_driving_and_parking_e/consumer_wheel_clamping_e/when_your_car_can_be_clamped_or_towed_away.htm

Stroma

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

This only took 2 mins to find:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98406/fact-sheet-part3.pdf

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/consumer_e/consumer_cars_and_other_vehicles_e/consumer_driving_and_parking_e/consumer_wheel_clamping_e/when_your_car_can_be_clamped_or_towed_away.htm

Yes pofa 2012 has been discussed on here to death, and its the only legislation on private land, something I have told you multiple times. And the adviceguide link says they must have lawful authority, something again I have told you multiple times. So thank you for proving my point!!

This only took two minutes to post

Coupon-mad

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

This only took 2 mins to find:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98406/fact-sheet-part3.pdf

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/consumer_e/consumer_cars_and_other_vehicles_e/consumer_driving_and_parking_e/consumer_wheel_clamping_e/when_your_car_can_be_clamped_or_towed_away.htm

Your point being?

We have been discussing the current law since it was first put forward as a Bill.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4360185

This only took 2 minutes to find.

Stroma

And here is the reality of it, exactly what you've been told multiple times, but you dismiss it out of hand, then link to it and it proves what we've been saying is correct

Lawful authority
The term “lawful authority” means where specific legislation or express powers are in force, which allow for vehicles to be legally immobilised or removed. Examples of lawful authority include where statutory powers exist such as Road Traffic Regulations which allow local authorities or the police to clamp or tow vehicles on public roads. Certificated bailiffs retain their powers to immobilise or remove vehicles. Certain statutory authorities also retain the ability to clamp and tow, such as the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA), who will continue to clamp or tow vehicles which are un-roadworthy or have not had their vehicle tax paid

There are other organisations and public bodies which can establish „lawful authority‟ through Acts of Parliament and local byelaws including airports, ports and harbours, strategic river crossings, as well as some railway stations and common land.

Clear signage outlining where parking is permitted and including the terms and conditions of parking should be displayed.
Bodies with lawful authority to clamp and tow may continue to contract out this work to private companies.

The terms and conditions of use in privately owned off-street car parks do not normally in themselves establish lawful authority. They are a contract between the car park owner and the motorist.

Independent legal advice should be sought, e.g. from a solicitor, if there is any uncertainty as to the status of land and whether lawful authority exists to control parking on that land using clamping or towing as a means of enforcement.

pogofish

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

You still haven't explained why you brought Parking Eye up???

If there is a possibility of it being legal in this case, then it wouldn't be a scam.

Read my posts....I raised a question, and didn't state a fact.

Because you lied - You were stooging for them just a few weeks ago.

No possibility - We have demonstrated that clearly in several forms, so your "question" didn't arise.

Now you continue to grasp at straws because of a few largely default judgments that were mainly from the small claims track, so the question of legal or illegal doesn't come into it.

Now you've been caught-out enough times. Why not go back to having your fun trying to talk teenage girls into overpriced data contracts on the tecchie boards.

Jamie_Carter

pogofish wrote: »

Because you lied - You were stooging for them just a few weeks ago.

Prove it.

I have never defended any parking company.

prosnap

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz .......................

atilla

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

Prove it.

I have never defended any parking company.

Hmmm
So not you posting and spouting p*sh in this thread then?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4394859