We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Shameless labour
Comments
-
wherediditallgothen wrote: »Post 449 I believe.
You mean this?Busiensses have always been allowed to make deductions based on the time they take in calculating taxes.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
How does that relate to reducing corporate taxes and allowing big companies to avoid paying any at all?Graham_Devon wrote: »Oh good lord, this is so tiresome.
I suppose all those paying 18% capital gains tax, are now denying what is "rightfully" the countries, as capital gains was reduced from 40% to 18%.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
How does that relate to reducing corporate taxes and allowing big companies to avoid paying any at all?
It doesn't.
What happened, is you got in a flap, and moved all the goalposts to suit your own agenda again.
Someone suggested reducing taxes, and allowing business to grow that way.
You instantly, in your wisdom, changed that, and suggested that companies would therefore be witholding funds which are rightfully the countries.
That's my point. You keep changing the basis of the discussion and using pedantry to try and win your little labour argument. You are doing it on the Ed Balls thread with me, suggesting I should join in an Ed Balls thread, and attack Cameron and Clegg, otherwise I'm tory through and through. The thread is about Ed Balls specifically. Notthing to do with Cameron or clegg!
Someone suggests removing some of the silly legistaltion, and you instantly change that to "are you mad, NO legislation....shall we let people just die and let companies screw people over".
You simply cannot discuss reasonably with you. And for that reason, I say good day to you sir.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »It doesn't.
What happened, is you got in a flap, and moved all the goalposts to suit your own agenda again.
Someone suggested reducing taxes, and allowing business to grow that way.
You instantly, in your wisdom, changed that, and suggested that companies would therefore be witholding funds which are rightfully the countries.
That's my point. You keep changing the basis of the discussion and using pedantry to try and win your little labour argument. You are doing it on the Ed Balls thread with me, suggesting I should join in an Ed Balls thread, and attack Cameron and Clegg, otherwise I'm tory through and through. The thread is about Ed Balls. Notthing to do with Cameron or clegg!
Again you keep raising Clegg, I have not mentioned Clegg, but you carry on with your little rant if it pleases you. You asked how companies keep money from the taxpayer that is rightfully theirs, I provided an example, but you chose to ignore it, because it doesn't fit with your agenda. That's okay, I understand that, you are entitled to your opinion (no matter how misguided it is), but don't bleat on about me having one.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
You do not seem to like giving a straight answer to any questions lately. How does a business make a deduction for the time involved without reducing profits?
:wall: :wall:The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
:wall: :wall:
Yes that's exactly how I feel. Any chance of an answer to the question you were asked?Set your goals high, and don't stop till you get there.
Bo Jackson0 -
To my knowledge you have not answered a single question asked, just posted totally wrong information.wherediditallgothen wrote: »Yes that's exactly how I feel. Any chance of an answer to the question you were asked?
Seriously, if you are not bright enough to read a thread, I am not going to help you.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
wherediditallgothen wrote: »Yes that's exactly how I feel. Any chance of an answer to the question you were asked?
It appears he has no answers. Just rather silly retorts.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards