We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Car noise has upset someone

1568101119

Comments

  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Ignore it - anyone who lacks the decency to speak to you directly and hide behind an anonymous note isn't worth even thinking about.
    Even it's an eighty-eight year old woman, living on her own, who feels intimidated by young people with noisy cars?
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    edited 21 January 2011 at 5:22PM
    Yes you can - complain to the police about this anti-social car use - the offender can be issued with a Section 59 notice for ant-social car use - two of them in 12 months and the car is impounded.

    That's the one to go for.
    It's got a non- standard exhaust, at an anti-social hour as well.
    (At a guess no middle box, and a straight through back box on a 1380?)
    If you are going to driving at that time, consider a different exhaust.
    Strider can be reported for the same thing, if he likes to sit at the roadside picking fights.
  • Keith
    Keith Posts: 2,924 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    Even it's an eighty-eight year old woman, living on her own, who feels intimidated by young people with noisy cars?

    Yet, they feel they can go up and touch their car knowing if caught it would be much harder to explain.

    Whilst S59 could apply...
    (1)
    Where a constable in uniform has reasonable grounds for believing that a motor vehicle is being used on any occasion in a manner which (a)
    contravenes section 3 or 34 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52)(careless and inconsiderate driving and prohibition of off-road driving), and

    (b)
    is causing, or is likely to cause, alarm, distress or annoyance to members of the public,


    he shall have the powers set out in subsection (3).

    I doubt the police would consider a road legal car would be an annoyance. As a former owner of a car most likely louder than the OPs and it being inspected by VOSA the noise was never mentioned.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    Keith wrote: »
    Yet, they feel they can go up and touch their car knowing if caught it would be much harder to explain.

    Whilst S59 could apply...



    I doubt the police would consider a road legal car would be an annoyance. As a former owner of a car most likely louder than the OPs and it being inspected by VOSA the noise was never mentioned.

    He would consider it an annoyance, if it was reported as such. I doubt your car is louder than the op's.
    It's probably similar to one of mine, and I wouldn't start it at 6.30 in the morning.
  • Keith
    Keith Posts: 2,924 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p-SFxVBn5g&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

    I await the "oh my god think of the kitten comments".

    Poor camera by the wife though, camera mount is a great option for 2011.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Keith wrote: »
    Yet, they feel they can go up and touch their car knowing if caught it would be much harder to explain.

    And your point???
    Whilst S59 could apply...



    I doubt the police would consider a road legal car would be an annoyance. As a former owner of a car most likely louder than the OPs and it being inspected by VOSA the noise was never mentioned.
    A police officer will consider a road legal car to be an annoyance, if it is being used as such; that is one very important point of the law being referred to here. I also suspect that VOSA s not concerned with the annoyance factor of a car, only if it passes the relevant tests.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Keith
    Keith Posts: 2,924 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    And your point???


    A police officer will consider a road legal car to be an annoyance, if it is being used as such; that is one very important point of the law being referred to here. I also suspect that VOSA s not concerned with the annoyance factor of a car, only if it passes the relevant tests.

    My point, it's easier to approach a neighbour and have a chat than that neighbour finding you leaving a note on their car.

    How is an annoyance to go to work?
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Keith wrote: »
    My point, it's easier to approach a neighbour and have a chat than that neighbour finding you leaving a note on their car.

    That would very much depend on how the neighbour thinks any approach maybe perceived and that leaving a polite note was the better option. I see from your video that you are very much the sort of driver who would defend any lack of courtesy of theirs, no matter what.
    How is an annoyance to go to work?

    I didn't write that it was an annoyance to go to work, you are now attempting avoiding the issue.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    And your point???


    A police officer will consider a road legal car to be an annoyance, if it is being used as such; that is one very important point of the law being referred to here. I also suspect that VOSA s not concerned with the annoyance factor of a car, only if it passes the relevant tests.

    Of course it's not road legal, it's an mot fail, so VOSA may well be interested in to why it has a valid mot.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    Of course it's not road legal, it's an mot fail, so VOSA may well be interested in to why it has a valid mot.

    What has MOTs got to with anti-social use of a car?
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.