We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Our left wing BBC [with evidence]

1111214161719

Comments

  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    What watching recorded programs???

    That breaches copyright? That illegal, or do you mean something else?
    It's not a shovel at all, but a great big JCB. :eek:
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    lucylucky wrote: »
    So not to clever with the search facilities then I see.:cool:

    You have indeed submitted a quote which for some reason you are unable to understand in the context of my earlier post that there is a perfectly legal way to watch TV programmes without a licence.

    Want another clue?

    Now this is a big one, see if you can work it out now......iplayer
    Aaw, what did go you tell him for?
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    Oh so only if they are not live, and basically on on a computer or console as the only other ways of getting Iplayer on a TV is on freesat, a licensed service.

    So you can watch downloaded content, not live TV programs.;)

    Congratulations for finally getting to the point.

    Must admit, would not have helped much for the world cup etc though.
    It gets worse. :D

    :rotfl::rotfl:
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Really2 wrote: »
    Oh so only if they are not live, and basically on on a computer or console as the only other ways of getting Iplayer on a TV is on freesat, a licensed service.

    So you can watch downloaded content, not live TV programs.;)

    Congratulations for finally getting to the point.

    Must admit, would not have helped much for the world cup etc though.

    You can link a PC up to a TV :)
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    vivatifosi wrote: »
    From the BBC website:

    If we saw, over time, that some people stopped receiving live broadcasts at all, stopped paying their licence fee, but continued to consume televison programmes, solely on-demand through the iPlayer (or other players), then we might have to consider talking to the Government about Part 4 of the Communications Act 2003 and the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004, so that they can then consider whether on-demand tv viewing might be brought within its aegis.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/01/iplayer_does_not_require_a_tv_1.html

    So if the number of people using iPlayer and not paying for a TV licence is seen to rise, then they will look to bring it under the licence.
    But until then, it is not an issue.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Wheezy_2
    Wheezy_2 Posts: 1,879 Forumite
    A._Badger wrote: »
    If you wish to watch any television in the UK then you are, indeed, forced to pay the BBC tax. And you damned well know it.

    As in most of Europe
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence

    I don't get those rants about what a disgrace it is to have to pay license fee even if you don't watch BBC.
    It's advert-free state television, what do you expect?
    If there wouldn't be a TV license, there would be a system of government grants paid by...surprise surprise...the taxpayer. ;)

    BTW ...some countries even have a radio license :cool:
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    StevieJ wrote: »
    You can link a PC up to a TV :)

    Is a computer not a PC:), see my full quote
    they are not live, and basically on on a computer or console as the only other ways of getting Iplayer on a TV is on freesat, a licensed service.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    It gets worse. :D

    What can you output your mobile phone to TV?
    OK I missed out BT Vision and Virgin but still they are both licenced services?

    The only way you can get it on Freeview is on red button, but that would require and arial connection?

    So what other routs to output to TV are there other than consoles and pcs? (tablets are PCs by the way)
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Wheezy wrote: »
    As in most of Europe
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence

    I don't get those rants about what a disgrace it is to have to pay license fee even if you don't watch BBC.
    It's advert-free state television, what do you expect?
    If there wouldn't be a TV license, there would be a system of government grants paid by...surprise surprise...the taxpayer. ;)

    BTW ...some countries even have a radio license :cool:

    I personally would not have a problem with the BBC introducing advertising. If it meant a lower TV licence great, it would help the poorer the most.
  • FTBFun
    FTBFun Posts: 4,273 Forumite
    Wheezy wrote: »
    As in most of Europe
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence

    I don't get those rants about what a disgrace it is to have to pay license fee even if you don't watch BBC.
    It's advert-free state television, what do you expect?
    If there wouldn't be a TV license, there would be a system of government grants paid by...surprise surprise...the taxpayer. ;)

    BTW ...some countries even have a radio license :cool:

    Good link.

    Interestingly in Europe the UK TV licence is quite fairly priced. It also pays for the BBC radio services which you can receive freely if you do not have a TV.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.