We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Our left wing BBC [with evidence]

1…910121415…19

Comments

  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    Wookster wrote: »
    Labour wins a safe Labour seat.

    Can someone explain the big fuss to me please?
    You could hardly call a majority of one hundred and three, "a safe seat." If you do I wonder what you would call a majority of two hundred.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    lucylucky wrote: »
    What would you like me to explain?

    Seems perfectly clear.

    Not one person has stated a legal way to watch TV programs?

    So there is one thing perfectly clear about where this thread is going, but it is nothing to do with the TV licence.
  • lucylucky
    lucylucky Posts: 4,908 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    Not one person has stated a legal way to watch TV programs? But there is a way, often mentioned on this site.

    So there is one thing perfectly clear about where this thread is going, but it is nothing to do with the TV licence.

    I have no idea where this thread is going.

    And what was it you wanted explained in the link you quoted?
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    lucylucky wrote: »
    I have no idea where this thread is going.

    And what was it you wanted explained in the link you quoted?

    Type how you watch TV legally without a licence, it cant be that hard surely?

    I don't see why you are being so obstructive if you are so confident it is legal?
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    A._Badger wrote: »
    Rubbish. No one forces you to buy an advertised product. You are forced to buy a TV Licence though - even if you never watch the BBC.
    You do if you want to eat, have a home, drive a car, take the bus, wear clothes..............
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It is hard enough to debate with 1 fool, never mind 1 fool with a blatant sockpuppet.:rotfl:
  • lucylucky
    lucylucky Posts: 4,908 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    Type how you watch TV legally without a licence, it cant be that hard surely?

    I don't see why you are being so obstructive if you are so confident it is legal?

    Not hard at all in fact there is a big clue in the stuff you quoted but you seem to have missed it.

    Here is a clue - third line down.

    If you still can't see it let me know and I'll tell you then:D
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    edited 18 January 2011 at 1:48PM
    Really2 wrote: »
    It is hard enough to debate with 1 fool, never mind 1 fool with a blatant sockpuppet.:rotfl:

    Yes, you and Badger really need to collude a little better.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • lucylucky
    lucylucky Posts: 4,908 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    It is hard enough to debate with 1 fool, never mind 1 fool with a blatant sockpuppet.:rotfl:

    Just because someone knows something you appear not to does not make anyone a fool.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    lucylucky wrote: »
    Not hard at all in fact there is a big clue in the stuff you quoted but you seem to have missed it.

    Here is a clue - third line down.

    If you still can't see it let me know and I'll tell you then:D
    HeHeHe, I don't think he understands the difference between the two concepts.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture