Tesco misprice discussion area part 13

wlfc1

Plushchris wrote:

Who does your wigs?

I got the idea from Mrs Doubtfire and Tootsie

renegade74

J Sainsbury
54 Morrisons Avenue
Somerfield
Asdashire
RNR1 34ME

Dick_Dastardly_3

upset54 wrote:

All advice/comments gratefully received.

Get on the blower to HO, explain the legal rights you have, CPA, ASA, and Tesco's own policy, etc. Tell them that if it is not sorted immediately you'll be contact TS and the press, etc. Have them print out a letter send it to the store, and tell them you wish to pick it up from the store in person, from the manager concerned following there debreifing to him on MR T, policies and the legality of the overcharge.

That should do nicely !! have a nice day !! EVERY LITTLE HELPS

Dick_Dastardly_3

MyUserNamesTaken wrote:

Oh, I've heard of it before...Tesco did this with the mispriced computers. It was to stop any more being sold at the wrong price. Rather than leave it up to the individual stores to read and react to HOST, HO fiddles with the central pricing database so that cashiers cannot sell the item. The items won't go through the tills.

correct, last year Mispriced PC. around the £500 mark (ish) although £100 O/C.

ginjim

!!!!!!_Dastardly wrote:

Get on the blower to HO, explain the legal rights you have, CPA, ASA, and Tesco's own policy, etc. Tell them that if it is not sorted immediately you'll be contact TS and the press, etc. Have them print out a letter send it to the store, and tell them you wish to pick it up from the store in person, from the manager concerned following there debreifing to him on MR T, policies and the legality of the overcharge.

That should do nicely !! have a nice day !! EVERY LITTLE HELPS

so has anyone been banned after HO intervention? is this a policy that HO adhere to or is it up to the managers descretion.
i find it shockuing that people can be banned from using tescos own policy

rdwarr

We seem to have a few people boasting about giving obviously false details again. If what you're doing is wrong then don't do it. If what you're doing is right then what are you worried about?
If it's OK to lie to Tesco then presumably the odd bit of shoplifting is OK too? There has to be a line somewhere.

the_postman_2

rdwarr wrote:

We seem to have a few people boasting about giving obviously false details again. If what you're doing is wrong then don't do it. If what you're doing is right then what are you worried about?
If it's OK to lie to Tesco then presumably the odd bit of shoplifting is OK too? There has to be a line somewhere.

Are you saying if i use comedy names im a shoplifter?

Get a life mate

If you dont like it dont read it

ikklenik

Had a really nice experience at CS today!

Had some over priced meat went to the desk and queried it. CS said oh yes we had a refund on this a few moments ago I have the label here and refunded me straight away, gave me the meat for free and told me to enjoy!

Was really shocked:eek:

I also got rolo's on out of date sel. very yummy they are too:j

georgiac

rdwarr wrote:

If it's OK to lie to Tesco then presumably the odd bit of shoplifting is OK too? There has to be a line somewhere.

I presume, maybe incorrectly, that your real name isn't rdwarr. Why make up an alias?

Your posts are most welcome but this one should really have been posted on the ethics thread as this one is strictly about people's experiences or misprices and frequents nocturnal habits!

Please see : http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=274398

Constantine

georgiac wrote:

I presume, maybe incorrectly, that your real name isn't rdwarr. Why make up an alias?

Your posts are most welcome but this one should really have been posted on the ethics thread as this one is strictly about people's experiences or misprices and frequents nocturnal habits!

Please see : http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=274398

Would the same not apply to the comments about giving false details? Or indeed frequents boasting. Neither are particulary on topic.

Personally, I fail to see why a seperate thread is required - its all the same topic. I also fail to see why rdwarr should pick up heat for holding an differing POV.