Staples have been really good to me.

fluffnutter

Don't believe a word of the original post, but I really love Staples. I've no idea what their customer service is like, having never had to return anything, but I do like to visit regularly. There's just something about stationery that really excites me.

fluffnutter

If you were unfortunate enough to have an IQ of lower than 20, you wouldn't be posting on interweb forums. On account of not having the intelligence to switch a computer on, or even talk probably.

smcaul

geordieracer wrote: »

We'll start off with this one sir marcus shall we?

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2736515




Well if you want to be pedantic and childish about it all these are my stats



Now i may not have a very big IQ according to you but it does seem i have more posts then yours and have been thanked more times then your self so your earlier statement is wrong also..

anyway ill let you two play..

I have no idea what you are on about! The post of mine you have quoted was in relation to me being accused of being an alias of SirMarcus, so I do not quite understand why you have quoted it again? But then I fear my understanding of you will remain always lacking (which I find a benefit rather then a hindrance!).

sirmarcus

smcaul wrote: »

I have no idea what you are on about! The post of mine you have quoted was in relation to me being accused of being an alias of SirMarcus, so I do not quite understand why you have quoted it again? But then I fear my understanding of you will remain always lacking (which I find a benefit rather then a hindrance!).

Totally agree.......it is very difficult to interpret an individual, who very clearly has limited intelligence and an IQ of less than 20.

I believe that he still thinks that we are the same person as result of his quote :

geordieracer wrote: »

anyway ill let you two play..

However, unless you can get down to his intelligence level (and it is a challenge), it is very difficult be sure.

I will give a full and proper response to his last posting later. It won't be difficult to do.:)

cyberbob

smcaul wrote: »

I have no idea what you are on about! The post of mine you have quoted was in relation to me being accused of being an alias of SirMarcus, so I do not quite understand why you have quoted it again? But then I fear my understanding of you will remain always lacking (which I find a benefit rather then a hindrance!).

No the post is pointing out this user

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/member.php?u=1224347

Who is an AE of sirmarcus and just pointing out that his AEs have been discovered before which

sirmarcus wrote:

Other than providing a couple of incorrect email addresses for escalation, I would also be grateful if you could how I 'have been found out before'.

So this is where you have been found out before. Geordieracer provided the evidence you wanted.

I

geordieracer

sirmarcus wrote: »

Totally agree.......it is very difficult to interpret an individual, who very clearly has limited intelligence and an IQ of less than 20.

I believe that he still thinks that we are the same person as result of his quote :



However, unless you can get down to his intelligence level (and it is a challenge), it is very difficult be sure.

I will give a full and proper response to his last posting later. It won't be difficult to do.:)

Give up you fool. Give me a response now or just shut up will you.. God knows why you want to take a while to think out something.. Your a waste.

sirmarcus

cyberbob wrote: »

No the post is pointing out this user

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/member.php?u=1224347

Who is an AE of sirmarcus and just pointing out that his AEs have been discovered before which
So this is where you have been found out before. Geordieracer provided the evidence you wanted.

I

Great stuff and entertainment.:rotfl::):D

So you think that CURIO is my alias ??? I haven't laughed so much for ages.:rotfl:

I have just re-read the thread https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2736515, which geordieracer provided in a previous posting and, now thanks to cyberbob's clarification, I understand what geordieracer is referring to. For info, I hadn't seen this thread until geordieracer's posting.

I was preparing a long-winded response to Geordieracer but, now seeing and understanding what he is inferring, I no longer need to bother. So many thanks cyberbob for saving my time.

I can't wait to show the wife as I'm sure she will find it amusing as well.

I may PM curios to see if he/she wishes to respond; although I see he/she hasn't posted anything since 2/10/10 so he/she may not even be an active member anymore.

Just some advise guys....don't give up the day jobs to become PIs....You will be out of buisiness within a month !!


Great stuff and entertainment !!:):rotfl::D:rotfl:

Very similar to accusing smcaul as being my alias.:)

sirmarcus

geordieracer wrote: »

Give up you fool. Give me a response now or just shut up will you.. God knows why you want to take a while to think out something.. Your a waste.

I think that you are speaking about yourself ?? After all, it took you over 12 hrs to respond to my post yesterday evening; so you can hardly talk.

Great stuff and entertainment.

sirmarcus

sirmarcus wrote: »

As Smcaul has said :



It is time for you (and others) to grow up....please reveal who you think this 'couple' are and provide evidence. Please also advise who you are apologising to as your posting is very obscure ?

Other than providing a couple of incorrect email addresses for escalation, I would also be grateful if you could how I 'have been found out before'.

Waiting for a response....:)

Geordieracer...I posted the above to you yesterday and you have still not given me and others the courtesy of a full response; so I will ask you again :

1. Please reveal who you think this 'couple' (of my alleged aliases in this thread) are and provide evidence ?

2. Please also advise who you are apologising to as one of your previous postings is very obscure and doesn't indicate the appropriate MSE users that you apologising to ?

I now know and understand what you mean by 'I have been found out before' and this relates to alleged allegations of alias names; however you have also alleged that I am a liar with regards my OP statement with regards Staples. I would be grateful for your evidence to support this.

If you can't put up, I suggest that you shut up !!

I hope the above is clear as I know that you do have an IQ problem. If it isn't, please advise and I will try to explain.:rotfl:

geordieracer

sirmarcus wrote: »

I think that you are speaking about yourself ?? After all, it took you over 12 hrs to respond to my post yesterday evening; so you can hardly talk.

Great stuff and entertainment.

Yes 12 hours. You know, overnight when people are in bed. Odd how that thread gave us the name marcus williams... AND was about CEO email addresess- something you yourself seem to know so much about. Face it, you have been rumbled again.

Cheerio.