Staples have been really good to me.

geordieracer

sirmarcus wrote: »

Sums up gordikin and geordieracer very nicely !!:):rotfl::D. As Phylpho stated, they are probably employees of PCWorld or Currys with nothing better to do.:rotfl:

why do we have to be employees of that company to try and call out sir marcus? the same sir marcus who has been found out before..

fine if your not his alias i apologise. But there are a couple of them in this thread.

sirmarcus

Thanks MSE user Coopdivi.........for posting an interesting article on the lack of constructive quality in ALL of Gordikins postings on MSE within a MSE thread entitled 'Online Copyright' at https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/38453936#Comment_38453936.

To quote Coopdivi :

'Don't take any notice of Gordikins. If you look through his posting history you'll find he never offers constructive advice only sneering criticism. To be fair a few posters deserve this treatment but most don't.'

Sums up Gordikins perfectly and how to treat this individual's posts.:D

suited-aces

smcaul wrote: »

So then, am I a liar as well??

I have been a member on here for a few years, have many, many posts and even more thank you's, so would you care to discredit my story in some way?

I know first hand just how far Staples seem to be prepared to go to keep customers - if a senior manager has to get involved they seem to take it very personally, and the value of the goods is not an issue, it seems to be service that they pride them selves on.

I think it's time you offered SM an apology, accusing someone of being a liar is pretty low in my book, unless you can prove it, which you can't. Time to man up or grow up.

Posts: 1,000
Thanked 577 Times

Something else doesn't add up!

Kentuniversity

Optimist wrote: »

Enjoy your party and thank you for the interesting synopsis of your viewing habits.

Do come back to this nasty unpleasant forum you will obviously fit right in

Party was great and I am feeling right at home in this 'unpleasant forum'.

One of my tutors has told me that I need to be more assertive and I'm sure this will help me.

Kentuniversity

gordikin wrote: »

How much?...I'll take the bet..name your price loser?...I'm willing to bet...you?

I think that I will ignore all of your postings now after reading Sirmarcus's last posting on this thread !:p

Kentuniversity

Equaliser123 wrote: »

Does that mean the drugs are wearing off?

Don't do drugs, never have, never will !!:p

smcaul

suited-aces wrote: »

Posts: 1,000
Thanked 577 Times

Something else doesn't add up!

I was actually referring to "Thanked 577 Times in 359 Posts", rather then my total post count!!

But hey, why let a little pedantry get in the way of a constructive argument!

sirmarcus

geordieracer wrote: »

why do we have to be employees of that company to try and call out sir marcus? the same sir marcus who has been found out before..

fine if your not his alias i apologise. But there are a couple of them in this thread.

As Smcaul has said :

smcaul wrote: »

I think it's time you offered SM an apology, accusing someone of being a liar is pretty low in my book, unless you can prove it, which you can't. Time to man up or grow up.

It is time for you (and others) to grow up....please reveal who you think this 'couple' are and provide evidence. Please also advise who you are apologising to as your posting is very obscure ?

Other than providing a couple of incorrect email addresses for escalation, I would also be grateful if you could how I 'have been found out before'.

Waiting for a response....:)

sirmarcus

smcaul wrote: »

I was actually referring to "Thanked 577 Times in 359 Posts", rather then my total post count!!

But hey, why let a little pedantry get in the way of a constructive argument!

I and many others knew what you were referring to !

Trouble is you do get a lot of posters on the forum with an IQ of less than 20 as you rightly indicated in a previous posting.

Can't wait to see what constructive (??) postings come next in this thread !:)

You realise that some of them with an IQ of less than 20 still think that we are the same person !!:rotfl:

geordieracer

We'll start off with this one sir marcus shall we?

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2736515

Originally Posted by suited-aces
Posts: 1,000
Thanked 577 Times

Something else doesn't add up!
I was actually referring to "Thanked 577 Times in 359 Posts", rather then my total post count!!

But hey, why let a little pedantry get in the way of a constructive argument!

Well if you want to be pedantic and childish about it all these are my stats

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,054
Thanked 862 Times in 481 Posts

Now i may not have a very big IQ according to you but it does seem i have more posts then yours and have been thanked more times then your self so your earlier statement is wrong also..

anyway ill let you two play..