We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tesco misprice discussion area part 12
Options
Comments
-
spa2k wrote:
Constantine...
ever get the feeling you are not wanted???
I think you should both put "Tesco Manager" in your avatars....if nothing else it might stop the stupid remarks, like "What RandRs have you had"...or "How do you know when the prices are updated on a night",,,,I'm sure theres been many more.
Although on second thoughts, any conection to Tescoemployee.....:rolleyes:
Forget my original request.........:oCouponing....."every little hurts"
Half of the people can be part right all of the time, Some of the people can be all right part of the time.
But all the people can't be all right all the time. .........I think Abraham Lincoln said that.
"I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours, "I said that............................ Bob Dylan 19630 -
Monster_Deals wrote:Given this Express is in an area of poor private housing (£120k to £300k) the normal 'Legoland / Rabbit Hutch' park and these type of people usually pay out a large proportion of their net income buying their box,....
I think your post came over a bit patronising. "These type of people" indeed. You mean there really are people whose houses are worth less than £300k? :rolleyes:Can I help?0 -
I noticed that. Since when does £100,000 mean poor?
Ok back to topic...0 -
rdwarr wrote:You know I thought I was doing OK but appear to be poor again now
I think your post came over a bit patronising. "These type of people" indeed. You mean there really are people whose houses are worth less than £300k? :rolleyes:
Depending on your interpretation it could be either.
Especially given Tesco's preference for more shops in lower income areas.0 -
rdwarr wrote:You know I thought I was doing OK but appear to be poor again now
I think your post came over a bit patronising. "These type of people" indeed. You mean there really are people whose houses are worth less than £300k? :rolleyes:
Indeed many millions of people with properties less than 300k....but very content and with respect from their families and peers
Edit... too many rrr's?0 -
Monster_Deals wrote:When you return an item for refund under the 28 day policy, does it have to be to the same store ?
If its a simple refund, then it isnt really important which store you take it back to...however, i find it best not to get refunds in stores that you regularly RandR in, as any large refund draws some type of extra notice to you.
If its a refund after an RandR, I would advise not to take it back to the store you originally RandRed it from.....I take mine to stores as far away as possible from my regular stores......
In doing this it assures that you are not drawing over attention to yourself....although both processess are perfectly legal, I would imagine a lot of the CS staff havent been trained to accept this.
PS...nice to see you changed your signature.....and a big admission from me.."I used to think I was scamming, until I learnt the definition of the word"Couponing....."every little hurts"
Half of the people can be part right all of the time, Some of the people can be all right part of the time.
But all the people can't be all right all the time. .........I think Abraham Lincoln said that.
"I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours, "I said that............................ Bob Dylan 19630 -
rdwarr wrote:You know I thought I was doing OK but appear to be poor again now
I think your post came over a bit patronising. "These type of people" indeed. You mean there really are people whose houses are worth less than £300k? :rolleyes:
Didn't mean to be patronising, I was trying to make a point about Tesco's charging its highest prices where people who are making the effort to buy their own homes are usually short of cash because they pay out a high proportion of their take home pay on their mortage.
Apologies for any offence, none was intended.0 -
Monster_Deals wrote:Didn't mean to be patronising, I was trying to make a point about Tesco's charging its highest prices where people who are making the effort to buy their own homes are usually short of cash because they pay out a high proportion of their take home pay on their mortage.
Apologies for any offence, none was intended.
Edit .... your sig...
Nice to see scammed is now replaced with fished0 -
babymoneyblagger wrote:Hi - I was reading the posts and thought that I would ask: If you have been banned but the manager says you can shop but not r&r-ing then couldnt you take a friend and let them put stuff in their trolley,pay then get r&r?
P.s - dont want to cause trouble, im just curious to find out if this would be a way round a ban(I have not been banned, just incase u thought i had).
Yes, thats one way to do it.Couponing....."every little hurts"
Half of the people can be part right all of the time, Some of the people can be all right part of the time.
But all the people can't be all right all the time. .........I think Abraham Lincoln said that.
"I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours, "I said that............................ Bob Dylan 19630
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards