We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Halifax Hpi September 2010 -3.6%

1313234363766

Comments

  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    Or maybe they realise having an economy based on a bubble is not sustainable in the medium term and have decided to try and sort it out. As opposed to the last lot that just went on pretending all was OK until it hit the buffers.
    i enjoy reading the posts from the Labour frothers...

    can we blame "the last lot" for the American economic crisis or how about the issues with the Euro. was that "the last lot" too?
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    Very true, and point well made. Under-bidders will tend to push the price up however in most of the housing markets at most of the time there aren't huge numbers of buyers chasing each house, AIUI in most of England at least it hasn't been like that since about 2003-4. Not least of which is because generally there are several houses that are similar either on the market or likely to come on the market for most peoples' requirements.

    I think what I said is true but your case holds true at points of market extremes such as in the early 90s when lots of forced sellers were chasing a small number of buyers and in the early 2000s when prices were racing away at a crazy rate.

    My point is probably born from my experience in the Scottish market where a sealed bids system operates.

    I've shown earlier this year that one of my collegues came 8th out of 10 bids. Certainly relevant to recent times

    I've bought a number of properties in Scotland throughout my lifetime with usually 4-5 bidders.

    In fact, only once in 2000 did I manage to get in and secure an offer before it was marketed in any earnest. that was hugely down to the circumstances for that particular property
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    i enjoy reading the posts from the Labour frothers...

    can we blame "the last lot" for the American economic crisis or how about the issues with the Euro. was that "the last lot" too?

    The fact that we had run up a massive defecit by spending a fortune on public services that we could not afford, left us much more vulnerable to the effects of outside influences. Hence the current situation.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    The fact that we had run up a massive defecit by spending a fortune on public services that we could not afford, left us much more vulnerable to the effects of outside influences. Hence the current situation.
    that's all very nice but this is exactly what you said
    As opposed to the last lot that just went on pretending all was OK until it hit the buffers.
    and here's what i said...
    can we blame "the last lot" for the American economic crisis or how about the issues with the Euro. was that "the last lot" too?
    we'd now have to blame "the last lot" for the global crisis of 2008 because there aren't many countries that don't have economic issues...

    obviously "the last lots" fault...
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    JonnyBravo wrote: »
    Surprised you've got time to write all this Conrad. What with those letters to your MP and counting your £20k/month income.

    The business generates that, not all for me by any stretch. Plenty of time in this life if you cut out everything non value added.
  • GeneHunt_2
    GeneHunt_2 Posts: 286 Forumite
    [QUOTE=Generali;37295334Rather than crash, we expect house prices to trend down relafively gradually over the final months of 2010 and in 2011 to lose around 10% in value.

    From Global Insight (again via the FT):

    (My red ink)

    [/QUOTE]

    Oh come on - do house prices ever "trend down relatively gradually" ? - they always fall off a cliff!
  • The Tories have tanked the economy let's all celebrate :j


    ............................NOT!
    A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step

    Savings For Kids 1st Jan 2019 £16,112
  • Viva la crash!
    Maidstone Prices - average reductions at 8.5% (£19,668) Feb 2012 - We thought the dudes were not allowed to drop prices?
  • RenovationMan
    RenovationMan Posts: 4,227 Forumite
    JonnyBravo wrote: »
    RR?
    Oops. You meant RM didn't you chucky?
    Easy slip to make though, what with those famously alliterative names we've had in the forums recent history.

    AA - erm cant think of one
    BB - erm stuck again
    CC - nope I'm a blank on this too.
    DD - I'm stuck again, can you help out on this RenovationMan?


    :rotfl:

    Sorry I cant help. I had no idea what chucky meant by the flaw in my argument and I'm clueless as to what all the above means. :p

    Im ashamed to admit that I had to google aliterative, but I'm still no further forward. :)

    Is this some clever joke at my expense? Debt monkey sort of thing? Well, come back in three years and we'll see who is laughing, especially if interest rates stay low. ;)
  • JonnyBravo
    JonnyBravo Posts: 4,103 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    chucky wrote: »
    careful you don't get confused or get in a muddle when you get a Kit Kat Chunky - they don't have 4 fingers of chocolate...

    4? Real or nominal?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.