We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
JJB gave grandsons ipod away.
Comments
-
crabyducky wrote: »oh by the way what the hell is an 11 year old doing with a £150 ipod??Don't you think that maybe it's not anyone's business who has what, or at what age?
This is a public forum we may express our opinion anyway we wish as long as it dosnt break the forum rules. Nothing in the rules state that i may not ask a simple question.MoneySpendingExpert0 -
crabyducky wrote: »This is a public forum we may express our opinion anyway we wish as long as it dosnt break the forum rules. Nothing in the rules state that i may not ask a simple question.
It doesn't matter if who lost what, the store handed over a valuable item from 'lost and found' without taking a record of the recipient or verifying it was the owners item0 -
crabyducky wrote: »This is a public forum we may express our opinion anyway we wish as long as it dosnt break the forum rules. Nothing in the rules state that i may not ask a simple question.
Yes indeed, what you say is very true.
It's my opinion that threads and discussions like these would benefit from people posting who were able to stick to the point and not veer off into matters that are irrelevant to the issue.Herman - MP for all!0 -
Regardless of the legal right and wrongs, the matter highlights JJB attitude to customers and their crap internal procedures.
London Underground (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/871.aspx) require "Personal Identification will be required in all cases of property collection" ... why don't JJB take the opportunity the OP has highlighted for them to improve their company. Says a lot about JJB.0 -
Regardless of the legal right and wrongs, the matter highlights JJB attitude to customers and their crap internal procedures.
London Underground (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/871.aspx) require "Personal Identification will be required in all cases of property collection" ... why don't JJB take the opportunity the OP has highlighted for them to improve their company. Says a lot about JJB.
Because the London Underground has hundreds of thousends of people going through it a day and has alot of lost property so would require this system more than a store that has hundreds of people a day and has a piece of lost property once in a blue moon.The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!
If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!
4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!0 -
You answered your own questionadouglasmhor wrote: »I support a hefty fine and compensation or return of the stolen goods. I do not condone or support state brutality of any kind. The only reason you could infer that from the post I made is you are somewhat unstable.Freddie_Snowbits wrote: »So would you advocate chopping the arms off offenders? That only cures the repeat offender, does the opportunist deserve this punishment?adouglasmhor wrote: »That would be morally, I think morely means like a specific type of mushroom.
Just because I disagree with you, your reason here.
Glad to be a sad person!0 -
ManxAvenger wrote: »I used to work for a large grocery facility on customer services and any lost property had to be fully logged and when claimed, we had to get I.D. with a name and address on it, which had to be entered onto the copy of the original logged sheet. We would always ask questions that only the real owner would know.
Shame on JJB, which branch was it?
If only JJB had excercised the same care with this young lad's IPOD, he'd more than likely have it back now, hopefully feeling very lucky and very chastened after a good talking to by Dad and maybe even have learned a lesson about taking better care of expensive items.
The scumbag of a thief may have been embarrased (although THAT's unlikely) by the store assistant's questions that clearly showed that she was trying to appropriate something that clearly didn't belong to her.
Is it really so difficult for a store to deal with lost property responsibly?0 -
any lost property on my land goes straight in the bin.Target Savings by end 2009: 20,000
current savings: 20,500 (target hit yippee!)
Debts: 8000 (student loan so doesnt count)
new target savings by Feb 2010: 30,0000 -
Another analgy on 'Lost Property' If the neighbours ball or aother comes into your yard, do you keep it or hand it back?
1 Keep it
2 Hand it back straight away 9I normall give a good drop kick and back it goes!)
3 hand it into the police after 28 days.
4 Burst it
Or if you lived near golf course, would you just get a collection of golf balls?0 -
^^ thats easy Freddy, If something lands in my garden and its not mine I throw it back out. (I live on a green so we get loads of toys and balls in my garden- so your analogy is true for me.)
Personally I would have considered the ipod lost forever once I realised I had left it in the shop theres no point blaming JJB for your loss.July Win: Nokia 58000
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards