Fiat 500?....

Zazen999

cyclonebri1 wrote: »

I really do hope thats a sarcastic yeahyeahetc, how can anyone want to own a copy of a car that was laughed at and was unbelievably crap the 1st time round??? Sinclair C5 anyone :wall::wall::wall:

Dear oh dear, banging your head on brick walls really seems to have done you some irretrievable damage.

Inactive

cyclonebri1 wrote: »

I really do hope thats a sarcastic yeahyeahetc, how can anyone want to own a copy of a car that was laughed at and was unbelievably crap the 1st time round??? Sinclair C5 anyone :wall::wall::wall:

Agreed;


A very poor copy of a car that was designed primarily as a very cheap, basic means of transport for peasants in latin countries, at least the original was cheap to buy.

Zazen999

Inactive wrote: »

Agreed;


A very poor copy of a car that was designed primarily as a very cheap, basic means of transport for peasants in latin countries, at least the original was cheap to buy.

Is that the best you can do?

jd82

Yeah a very poor copy of what? The Panda is one of the best selling cars in Europe. Actually I cannot be bothered arguing with brain dead idiots any more.

Inactive

I wasn't talking about the Panda, if your post is targeted at me, I was discussing the 500.

Inactive

Zazen999 wrote: »

Is that the best you can do?

Don't like facts then ?

jd82

Inactive wrote: »

I wasn't talking about the Panda, if your post is targeted at me, I was discussing the 500.

I assumed you were with the peasents comment. The 500 is not supposed to be a peasent car.

I actually like the 500 but I wouldn't buy one because I need the five doors. The 500 is very good value for money when you consider how easy it is to get discounts and how well equiped it is.

Inactive

jd82 wrote: »

I assumed you were with the peasents comment. The 500 is not supposed to be a peasent car.

I actually like the 500 but I wouldn't buy one because I need the five doors. The 500 is very good value for money when you consider how easy it is to get discounts and how well equiped it is.

The original 500 was a Peasants Car, which the new 500 is loosely based upon, do try to keep up...;)

The new 500 is over priced, and over hyped.

The Panda is a far better car and far better value, if you really are in to buying Fiats.

mikey72

I've owned a Fiat, not a 500, one was the Tempra, the other was the 500's successor the 126. Both superb cars, both good to drive, and both totally reliable.
I fancy the 500 Abarth as a fun car to have.

Zazen999

mikey72 wrote: »

I've owned a Fiat, not a 500, one was the Tempra, the other was the 500's successor the 126. Both superb cars, both good to drive, and both totally reliable.
I fancy the 500 Abarth as a fun car to have.

As you say, some people just don't know how to have a little fun in their lives.