We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Seeking Possesion Notice Advice PLS.
Options
Comments
-
I'll need a cpl of days to absorb the letter but....
Bullet point one is nonsense in this case - and they know it. There is plenty of evidence available to prove otherwise.
I cant help but to wonder why they are holding back on producing there evidence. I'm also picking up they want to assign or brand me as a THUG
.Your tax bill is the penalty you pay for not helping the right candidates get into office.:D0 -
Reading through the correspondence from the council - i didnt post the reply email on the thread that i received from the council with reference to the NoSP. How should i take their closing statement of the letter? Its seems very close to a threat to me.
Turning to the rebanding issue - I think by them rewiting the Rebanding letter and asking me to speak with the Housing Manager is a way of introducing confusion. Why? Why would they want to be obstructive and confusing?
It looks as though i have shot myself in the foot with my statement of "Primary" reason for moving.
Your tax bill is the penalty you pay for not helping the right candidates get into office.:D0 -
VIGILANT22 wrote: »Ha...try proving that against "an establishment".......waste of time.......
Iv'e been saving this for you to prove it can be done... :rotfl:
There are two issues.
1) Served me with a Notice Seeking Possession for propping open the block security door and acting in a aggressive confrontational manner to another residident..
2) Downgraded my priority from B to C because of New Information Received.
To recap.
I asked the council for me to be heard and for dates and times of the alleged incidents. They denied me the right to be heard and also, under a freedom of information request refused to supply me with the relevant information that i had requested. They also refused to supply me with a Refusal Notice.
After much correspondence with them they maintained i wasn’t entitled to any information until such times that they felt fit to evict me via the courts.
I then asked for the councils NOSP appeal procedures, (in writing) they wouldn’t give me them for a very long time arguing that there was no need for me to have them on account the notice only acted as a warning. I pushed and push them HARD for the appeal procedures threatening them with the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO), finally they caved in stating; “ the council does not have appeal procedures”. Furthermore, they stated that, the times and dates of the alleged incidents were “ sometime between January and February 2010, but they didn’t have the specific dates and times”.
Correct me if I’m wrong but anyone living in a property that is used as their main residence with no right to be heard would be seen as a Human Rights Denial at Judicial Review (JR). I couldn’t believe what i was reading...... I knew then they were making this up as they went along.
Two weeks ago i wrote to the LGO complaining of Maladministration and causing an injustice on the following grounds;
[FONT="]a) Coming to a conclusion that complaints against me were justified,[/FONT]
[FONT="]b) Issuing me with a warning [/FONT]
[FONT="]c) Not having a procedure in place to put me back to where I were in the first place.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Also, a Accommodation Concern lawyer is starting JR proceeding. [/FONT]
Furthermore, I have reported the council to the Information Commoner for breachs of the Freedom of Information Act.
[FONT="]
So you see... It can be done if you believe in what your doing and your doing it for the right reasons. :T
Edit to ad: A great information source, Case Law[/FONT]
http://www.ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/ow_case_law.html[FONT="]
[/FONT]Your tax bill is the penalty you pay for not helping the right candidates get into office.:D0 -
Iv'e been saving this for you to prove it can be done... :rotfl:
There are two issues.
1) Served me with a Notice Seeking Possession for propping open the block security door and acting in a aggressive confrontational manner to another residident..
2) Downgraded my priority from B to C because of New Information Received.
To recap.
I asked the council for me to be heard and for dates and times of the alleged incidents. They denied me the right to be heard and also, under a freedom of information request refused to supply me with the relevant information that i had requested. They also refused to supply me with a Refusal Notice.
After much correspondence with them they maintained i wasn’t entitled to any information until such times that they felt fit to evict me via the courts.
I then asked for the councils NOSP appeal procedures, (in writing) they wouldn’t give me them for a very long time arguing that there was no need for me to have them on account the notice only acted as a warning. I pushed and push them HARD for the appeal procedures threatening them with the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO), finally they caved in stating; “ the council does not have appeal procedures”. Furthermore, they stated that, the times and dates of the alleged incidents were “ sometime between January and February 2010, but they didn’t have the specific dates and times”.
Correct me if I’m wrong but anyone living in a property that is used as their main residence with no right to be heard would be seen as a Human Rights Denial at Judicial Review (JR). I couldn’t believe what i was reading...... I knew then they were making this up as they went along.
Two weeks ago i wrote to the LGO complaining of Maladministration and causing an injustice on the following grounds;
[FONT="]a) Coming to a conclusion that complaints against me were justified,[/FONT]
[FONT="]b) Issuing me with a warning [/FONT]
[FONT="]c) Not having a procedure in place to put me back to where I were in the first place.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Also, a Accommodation Concern lawyer is starting JR proceeding. [/FONT]
Furthermore, I have reported the council to the Information Commoner for breachs of the Freedom of Information Act.
[FONT="]
So you see... It can be done if you believe in what your doing and your doing it for the right reasons. :T
[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]
Wow.. you have been busy lol0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards