Mobiles co uk

mobilejunkie

Mobiles.co.uk_company_representative wrote: »

Evidence? Perhaps the police should be informed? You really make hyperbole into a fine art. It took over 300 posts before you'd even tell me what your problem was and then it turns out you were declined by our Quality Team and chose to interpret this as us "denying you a deal" when in fact it's simply down to us limiting the number of contracts we supply to any one individual.

MJ, Silk - obviously you've not noticed but (more or less) if you're on a thread then I'm not, even if questions are addressed to me or I could help out. It's just not worth the endless harassment to get involved.

We comply fully with DSR, UTCCR and every other regulatory and legal requirement. If you have any evidence to the contrary then again, please share it so I can investigate.

Regards,

How Do you come up with SO many lies???

Your "quality" team did no such thing - and how would YOU know??? As I have repeatedly stated iit didn't go through because the offer on your website was (YET ANOTHER) MISTAKE and you wouldn't honour it! It had absolutley NIOTHING to do with the limits you self-impose on the numbers of contracts - I am aware of those but haven't mentioned them because they aren't relevant. You really do struggle to come up with excuses, don't you?

As for your investigative prowess and compliance with "regulations", I'm more than confident that you are the LAST person I would trust to assist since you are plainly TOTALLY untrustworthy and thoroughly dishonest - and would be a disgrace to yuor company if they weren't so bad themsleves that you had to appear on here in the first place!


Perhaps if you spent less time counting and thinking up lies you'd actually deal with the issues - but, then you aren't on here for THAT, are you???