Quidco

geordieracer

ruthha wrote: »

Another one to add to the troll list @ http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/profile.html?do=ignorelist


3 plus 3 = 6.

I have never said that Quidco are holding money back from members .


Have a nice day and always remember

Pls be nice to all MoneySavers. There's no such thing as a stupid question, and even if you disagree courtesy helps.

PPs . more information for the few people that are not happy with what i am doing and what i am saying please feel free to use the following.http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/profile.html?do=ignorelist. just type in Ruthha . Thank you

We are being nice Ruthha YOU are the ones who are calling us trolls when we are only asking you a question which you cannot seem to answer.

3+3= 6. Your right it does but when you count forwards you will realise that you count it differently adn you were in fact wrong. We are not trolls for trying to point htis out to you , in fact we are trying to help you but in youor rage at what you think is 6 months is different to what is 6 months from your inception date.

Torby

Torby wrote: »

Ruthha any update on the meeting with Quidco staff ?

any update?

Lynsey

ruthha, any joy with Quidco yet??

Or have they declined their request to have a meeting at your choice of venue??

FWIW, I would put my house on the latter.
If it does ever go ahead I would advise it to be witnessed for both parties in case of any disputes on this forum, surely that would make sense.
How about getting somone to video it and we could all see what went on, that would be a great insight...........unless Quidco have something to hide...........or indeed yourself. (lol).

Good luck anyway, hope Quidco don't renege on their offer to you.

Lynsey

Torby

RUTHHA said :

"In the email i have spoken about the meeting with Quidco , Quidco have stated that they will not have the meeting at my solicitors office or want any form of legal people at the meeting"

think I mentioned some time ago that a meeting in a solicitors office would not be condusive to an open and frank discussion, a discussion where transparency and trust would be of the utmost importance, at the time it was even hinted that this was a ploy to by RUTHHA to AVOID having to meet Quidco.

I mean who in their right mind would not have talks at a neutral location? Obviously wanting a meet at a your solicitors office was going to be a bit of a non starter as pointed out. So there we have it (those of you that can read my posts...lol) Ruthha had "accepted" an offer to meet Quidco (yes they agreed at a location of her choice) but as was said at the time she chose to have it in HER solicitors office, with HER accountant on HER home territory.

Lets be fair, she didn't take up an offer to meet Quidco in THEIR offices and there was no mention of solicitors or accountants then and she still refused the meeting.

I knew she would wangle her way out of it, I knew she had no intention of a purposeful meeting, again ignoring questions and an ideal opportunity to set the record straight.

So how many people have you actually got money back for so far....and to be evenhanded, if Jules is reading this, how many people has Ruthha's actions against Quidco actually helped?

finally, have you mentioned taking your husband? after all most people on MSE know he's a solicitor and part of your legal team...if he's going as your husband and NOT a solicitor why not ask...

Lynsey

Personally I think it would be correct for "both sides" to be represented at any "meeting" and for minutes to be taken, makes sense to me to avoid any issues later.
To be fair it was Quidco's request to meet at ruthha's place of choice, so any avoidance to this request once accepted by ruthha would have to come from Quidco.
Ruthha obviously wants to ask serious questions, so why not be properly represented??
TBH, I believe Quidco has called ruthha's bluff and it has backfired, they fully underestimated her ability and are now frightened.
Maybe Martin could mediate - who knows??

Lynsey

gordikin

Oh dear! Martin Lewis owns and runs MSE. Listen to last Fridays Radio 2 Jeremy Vine Show (around 1.15-1.30 pm) and hear Martin tell you himself.

Lynsey

ruthha wrote: »

Lynsey .
If they like it or not i am trying to help other members get there cashback and will continue to do so .

............and that's the beauty of it, trying to help others.

While you are trying to fight for others, there are others who would rather fight you than try to help.

Good luck in your efforts, catch up soon.

Lynsey

gordikin

ruthha wrote: »

4. This website/forum is not owned or managed by Martin Lewis in any direct way. It has nothing to do with him other than it has his name on it and he started it. This is to ensure he cannot be held accountable for any liabelous or contentious content :money:so writing directly to Martin may not produce the result required.

5. This website is clearly classified as unmoderated and contentious posts are removed as and when appropriate. As a public forum, the right to membership of and to post on this forum is entirely at the discretion of the site owner (who isn't Martin) - there's no such thing as freedom of speech on the internet and for those who frequent the Discussion Time threads here, will be well aware that there are many taboo subjects (muslims, terrorism, maddy Mccann, etc) - no logic as to why, just is.

FACT

Listen to the Jeremy Vine Show and hear Martin tell you himself.

Fact....I don't need to shout!

Torby

could someone please ask Ruthha how many people she has (by her intervention) been able to get cashback owed to them, paid over by Quidco.

That might be a good indication of how well she's done in her campaign.

Fenris

Torby wrote: »

could someone please ask Ruthha how many people she has (by her intervention) been able to get cashback owed to them, paid over by Quidco.

That might be a good indication of how well she's done in her campaign.

ruthha, Torby would like to know the above quoted.

Personally I couldn't give a stuff how many or how few people she's managed to help, at least she's trying to do something for others instead of having a pop at other members of MSE for doing what they think is right.