We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Aaaaaargh! Comet!!!!
Comments
-
marks87 wrote:Not if a repair would cause me significant disruption he can't.
But you quoted IMEDIATE REUND OR REPLACEMENT a few threads back, where o where has the repair suddenly appeared from?
Since when is a repair going to cause significant disruption"Save the cheerleader - Save the world"0 -
marks87 wrote:Yes, which means I have six months in which to return them. If the retailer cannot prove that the fault was not present at point of sale, I am entitled to a repair or replacement. If either of these would cause me significant disruption, I am entitled to a refund.
I think it's you who doesn't know the law well enough.
Since when is a replacement going to cause significant disruption, i would like to see that one go to court!!!!"Save the cheerleader - Save the world"0 -
glowy69 wrote:Yeah it was new, but it was 4 months old, and as I had driven it an used it, they had it in for repair something I had no problem with because I undersdtand warranties etc, something some people seem to have trouble with on here.
Then you should have had a loan car, Did you ask for one? You mention the warranty, but as the car was only 4 months old this is down to your statutory rights, the warranty is in addition to these, you should not have to go without for 2 weeks because of their problems.0 -
zorber wrote:Since when is a replacement going to cause significant disruption, i would like to see that one go to court!!!!
If they can't offer a replacement then all tehy can do is offer a repair, if that caused significant disruption then you are entitled to a refund.0 -
If the repair takes the stated 28 days, then it will cause significant disruption. Lets look at one of my other Comet problems:zorber wrote:Since when is a repair going to cause significant disruption
I recieved a digital camera for Christmas 2004. This was bought near the start of December and (naturally) wasn't opened. Everything seemed fine with it, but a few days after the New Year, I had the camera on my desk transferring pictures to the PC. I noticed that the battery cover wasn't closed properly, so I tried to close it - only to discover that one of the "legs" was missing. It hadn't snapped off, because of the place where it was supposed to be attached didn't have a "wound" consistent with snapping.
It went back and we were told it would be booked in for a repair; we asked to see the manager. After getting nowhere, we decided to wait until the next day when I phoned Trading Standards and told them the story; they agreed with me and I had a new camera within 24 hours.
The reason I didn't accept a repair, is because I needed that camera to meet a deadline - in other words, not having it would have caused me significant disruption.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards