We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Sexual discrimination/equal pay issue
Comments
-
I cant believe this thread is still going!0
-
-
-
I think it's really good to be able to follow the case from the very start and hopefully to a positive ending.
In particular I hope it taught all the people who were very negative a lesson, as they were saying there was no case!0 -
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »With Hedger & his wife launching attacks at all angles what else did you expect?
with the compnay lying thru their teeth and even trying to prevent my wife from working AFTER she was shafted what do YOU expect0 -
-
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »From the start you were going this way Hedger.
& that was before the ex-company contact the new company...
Debatable (though lets not..) But agree that the company has managed to trip itself up at every given opportunity re process thus making the 'way forward' for hedger into a no brainer.....Go round the green binbags. Turn right at the mouldy George Elliot, forward, forward, and turn left....at the dead badger0 -
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »From the start you were going this way Hedger.
& that was before the ex-company contact the new company...
u are correct as we knew it was a totally flawed process from the outset. other things have emerged since then and it has been quite satisfying to see the company squirm (especially the charming ex-director). nothing may come out of the whole thing but my wife is pleased she has had her say0 -
another question on "Protective Award" in terms of proper consultation with the workforce....
does a company legally have to appoint a employee elected consultation rep if they make more than 20 people redundant?
no consultation rep was appointed in my wifes case. She now has in her possession the completed HR1 form relevant to her redundancy.
question on the HR1 "has a employee representative been appointed?" Company answer "Yes"
all throughout her (minuted) appeals she asked why wasnt a employee rep appointed to ensure a fair and transparent process and she was told "we dont need one"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards