We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Your screen resolution of choice
Comments
-
-TangleFoot- wrote: »1680x1050 (desktop); 1024x600 (netbook)
Same Here and 1024 x 768 on Works LaptopCheers
Steve0 -
Other - 1680 x 1050
Why? Because LCD screens only look 'right' at their native resolution.0 -
weegie.geek wrote: »I've noticed that too. My friend with a mac doesn't maximise windows, whereas I do. Even when using two monitors, I have one thing maximised on each monitor.
Ive done that since Workench days though, so it's not a windows thing in my case at least.
I guess it's because Mac OS X doesn't have a maximise button, it has a zoom button which resizes the window to fit its contents.0 -
I'm the same as weegie.geek, I alway maximise. I don't actually know why, but I dont like clutter on my screens, so would rather switch programs than have more than one visible. I run 3 monitors at work, and have something maximised on each (not inc messenger windows).0
-
Are you only allowing MSE members to view your site? If not it's largely irrelevant what we are using. If you search the web you will find worldwide stats on screen resolutions. However, websites should not be designed for any one particular resolution, for many reasons.
That most be a very old book to recommend designing for one set resolution, things have moved on since then. I'd recommend a new book on web design and useability
Good luck with your site. Rocky.0 -
1600x900
multiple side by side windows!
woopBack by no demand whatsoever.0 -
2048 x 1152.
Not really relevant though. Design it for 1024 width and use Firefox Web Dev Toolbar to set your window size.
If the book you're reading mentions 640x480 it must be hugely out of date. I'd seriously look for another book that deals with XHTML and CSS.0 -
All of the following:
1024 x 600 -- MSI Wind netbook (native)
1024 x 768 -- Apple 15" LCD display (native)
1280 x 1024 -- Samsung 19" LCD display (native)
1280 x 854 -- Apple G4 15.2" PowerBook (native)
1440 x 900 -- MacBook Pro 15.4" (native)
1680 x 1050 -- Apple 20" LCD display (native)
1920 x 1200 -- Apple 23" LCD display (native)
2560 x1600 -- HP 30" LCD display (native)
That assumes that people only do one thing at a time when using their computer. I'm chatting on messenger and watching TV on mine as well as browsing. Sometimes I'll be using iTunes, talking on Skype, and checking my emails as well. Websites that want to take over my whole screen are very very annoying.
Marty J,
You really would benefit from exploring how Spaces in OS X can assist you with this.
Don't laugh at banana republics. :rotfl:
As a result of how you voted in the last three General Elections,
you'd now be better off living in one.
0 -
1920 x 1200 on 2 x 24"s0
-
1280 x 720 - 17"A cloudy day is no match for a sunny disposition~ William Arthur Ward ~0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards