We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Your screen resolution of choice

24567

Comments

  • Marty_J
    Marty_J Posts: 6,594 Forumite
    Here's one sampling of screen resolutions:

    http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp

    There are lots more if you have a search for them. 1024 x 768 and up is the most common. That doesn't mean you should make all your pages 1024 or 1280 pixels wide though. I can't remember the last time I had my browser maximised to fill the whole screen; many people do other things while they're browsing the net these days.
  • basmic
    basmic Posts: 1,043 Forumite
    1680 x 1050
    Everybody is equal; However some are more equal than others.
  • purplevamp
    purplevamp Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    How should I know? :confused: I'm a girl :p











    Actually, it's 1440 x 900, but I don't know what that means!!!
    Mortgage: Was: £154,495 Oct 2039 Now: £80,748.41 May 2037
    Swagbucks ~ £205 (2024 ~ £395)
    Surveys ~ £207.94 (2024 ~ £280.14)
    Make £2025 in 2025 #5 ~ £1,406.55 ~ (2024 ~ £2,561.04)
  • -TangleFoot-
    -TangleFoot- Posts: 4,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    You should be developing towards 1280*1024 and 1280*800
    If everyone did that, browsing the web would be an intolerable experience for users of smaller screens. The EeePC 701 has a default resolution of only 800x480!

    Besides, people with larger screens don't necessarily want their browser to occupy the entire screen. Standard practice at present is to design pages for display in a window no less than 1024 pixels in width.

    As long as I can browse the web without scrolling left or right, I'm happy. :)
  • weegie.geek
    weegie.geek Posts: 3,432 Forumite
    If everyone did that, browsing the web would be an intolerable experience for users of smaller screens. The EeePC 701 has a default resolution of only 800x480!

    Besides, people with larger screens don't necessarily want their browser to occupy the entire screen. Standard practice at present is to design pages for display in a window no less than 1024 pixels in width.

    As long as I can browse the web without scrolling left or right, I'm happy. :)

    netbook users are in the minority, people should develop with the majority in mind.

    http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp

    Obviously it's silly to make websites larger than they have to be to be functional, but I'd rather something needed to be full screen at 1280*800 than it was cramped. With tabbed browsing, fullscreen browsing's not a problem.
    They say it's genetic, they say he can't help it, they say you can catch it - but sometimes you're born with it
  • Marty_J
    Marty_J Posts: 6,594 Forumite
    With tabbed browsing, fullscreen browsing's not a problem.

    That assumes that people only do one thing at a time when using their computer. I'm chatting on messenger and watching TV on mine as well as browsing. Sometimes I'll be using iTunes, talking on Skype, and checking my emails as well. Websites that want to take over my whole screen are very very annoying.

    Curiously though, working with everything maximised seems to be a very Windows way of doing things. I always know when a Windows user has been using my Mac, as they stretch everything out to fill the screen. Seems silly to me, but I guess people use a computer in the manner they're used to, regardless of what platform it is.
  • 1280 x 800. 15.4" screen.
  • 1920 x 1200 on 24"'s
  • vaio
    vaio Posts: 12,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    1920 x 1200 on 17” laptop and the same at work on a 23” screen
  • weegie.geek
    weegie.geek Posts: 3,432 Forumite
    Marty_J wrote: »
    Curiously though, working with everything maximised seems to be a very Windows way of doing things. I always know when a Windows user has been using my Mac, as they stretch everything out to fill the screen. Seems silly to me, but I guess people use a computer in the manner they're used to, regardless of what platform it is.

    I've noticed that too. My friend with a mac doesn't maximise windows, whereas I do. Even when using two monitors, I have one thing maximised on each monitor.

    Ive done that since Workench days though, so it's not a windows thing in my case at least. :)
    They say it's genetic, they say he can't help it, they say you can catch it - but sometimes you're born with it
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.