Is CSA1 an exact science? (if so where can I get a copy of the formula) -merged-

hanny83_2

Oh God I haven't read any of his previous threads but I think his mind is already convinced that NRPs are the enemy but as they say... no smoke with out fire!!

mothballed

hanny83 wrote: »

But is it unlawful or is that just your opinion?

Its my opinion - based on my understanding of the Child Support Act 1991 and its numerous secondary legislation. OTOMH heres a summary.

1. The prescribed government poverty threshold is £60.50 a week but the CSA contradict it by charging arrears.
2. The CSA says I am out of time for making an appeal - while the law says I am entitled to a fair trial established in law and impartial.
3. The CSA contradict its own rules by saying corrections cannot be backdated but able to backdate corrections whenever it suits them.
4. The CSA says the maximum a CSA payer can have deducted from his wages is 30% for two children but they are deducting 52% on a DEO.
5. The CSA assessed me on a specimen 2 week in summer 2007 when I working 75 hours a week then pretend I work 75 hours a week for 52 weeks a year.
6. The CSA thinks a non-dependant is someone who rents a bedsit in a house that is owned by his uncle who permanently lives abroad.

mothballed

Loopy_Girl wrote: »

he had a letter confirming that he would be receiving £121.00 a fortnight.

who said it was a letter?

Apparently you have been in trouble with the moderators on this forum before Loopy Girl. You are an Internet Troll. I have just has an interesting chat.

I just had the Wikipedia lesson on the subject of Internet trolls and thats definitely you!

Loopy_Girl

mothballed wrote: »

who said it was a letter?

Apparently you have been in trouble with the moderators on this forum before Loopy Girl. You are an Internet Troll. I have just has an interesting chat.

I just had the Wikipedia lesson on the subject of Internet trolls and thats definitely you!

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Seriously - where are you getting this stuff from?!!!!!!! Never had a problem with mods in my life

hanny83_2

The arrears will still stand even when you go on benefits. I don't know all of the facts but you seem to be complaining on here alot when you should be concentrating your energy on the CSA. I'm not saying I don't believe you but I know how they calculate maintenance and you would have had to supply several wage slips and they would have averaged out your working hours. If they were deducting 50 odd percent on a DEO this is unacceptable and against the law but you wouldnt have been placed on DEO had you been compliant or at least made some attempt to make payments.

marksoton

mothballed wrote: »

.
4. The CSA says the maximum a CSA payer can have deducted from his wages is 30% for two children but they are deducting 52% on a DEO.

The maximum they can take is 40% and this includes arrears.

mothballed

Apparently you have previously come to the attention of the moderators because you have had complaints made against you for your conduct in this forum. You have have a history of taking discussions off topic, and posting inflammatory and irrelevant comments.

mothballed

marksoton wrote: »

The maximum they can take is 40% and this includes arrears.

Mark, do you have any legislation for that? This is the holy grail I have been looking for.

marksoton

hanny83 wrote: »

but you wouldnt have been placed on DEO had you been compliant or at least made some attempt to make payments.

I am afraid this is not true. The OP aside countless compliant NRP's are being put on DEO's through no fault of their own.

mothballed

I concur with marksoton on that.