Is CSA1 an exact science? (if so where can I get a copy of the formula) -merged-

LizzieS_2

mothballed wrote: »

Zara33 since you were the one who joined my thread with an adverse comment then you applauded someone who thinks I should not have a 2nd family (after being deliberately deprived of my first), i think its best you stay with the PWC group. I am in the NRP group and not interested in what you think.

This site does not ban people from posting just because they are from a different 'camp'. If you want a site that specifically relates to nrp's only, I suggest you try googling a little more as there are some that will fulfil your hopes.

Loopy_Girl

Quite clearly it wasn't deemed to be harrassment (or you are lying. again) as nothing came of it.

If you feel the need to PM the poison that you have previously however then these will be passed to admin as before.

Loopy_Girl

LizzieS wrote: »

This site does not ban people from posting just because they are from a different 'camp'. If you want a site that specifically relates to nrp's only, I suggest you try googling a little more as there are some that will fulfil your hopes.

Oh I think the OP knows exactly what site you are talking about. Differing 'camps'? Not something that has ever been used on THIS site now is it?;)

jacklink

LIKE I SAID LOOPY GIRL

Do Not Reply To My Comments
You Have Been Reported Before For Harrasment
You Are Not Welcome To Comment On Any Of My Comments
You Are A Stalker And Need Help.

marksoton

LizzieS wrote: »

This site does not ban people from posting just because they are from a different 'camp'. If you want a site that specifically relates to nrp's only, I suggest you try googling a little more as there are some that will fulfil your hopes.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Thats underhand

Loopy_Girl

This is a public forum and I'll comment all I want - got it?:rolleyes:

mothballed

paulherts wrote: »

I have asked them to take me to court so that an independent forum can decide on what is right. They refuse.

I understood the CSA go to a magistrates court and applies for a liability order to enforce the debt, not really a fair trial as such, just a rubberstamp proceeding. I think Section 34(ish) of the Child Support Act prevents the defendant from defending the grounds at which the debt arises and the outcome of the proceeding is determined before the defendant has even been summonsed to appear before the court. (Google - Kangaroo Court)

I learn from this forum that I ask the CSA for an appeal, then contact MP then go from there. Is this appeal actually a legit independant forum (subject of my next thread - getting ready for the appeal) or just a closed-doors thing run by the CSA?

marksoton

mothballed wrote: »

I understood the CSA go to a magistrates court and applies for a liability order to enforce the debt, not really a fair trial as such, just a rubberstamp proceeding. I think Section 34(ish) of the Child Support Act prevents the defendant from defending the grounds at which the debt arises and the outcome of the proceeding is determined before the defendant has even been summonsed to appear before the court. (Google - Kangaroo Court)

Not always so. If you are well prepared and stand your ground there are instances where the LO will not be awarded.

paulherts

Mothballed

I thought they needed a court order but apparently they don't, the Secretary of State has devolved powers to issue a DEO and that is what has happened in my case.

I am going through my MP but it is going to be a drawn out process and in the meantime they raid my wages each month. I have no problem paying what I owe but these made up arrears is the final straw.

Cheers Paul

kelloggs36

The CSA don't need a court order to collect via a DEO. As has been stated many times, on CS1 you have to be left with your protected income, anything else can be taken to cover arrears. As you keep saying that they are taking 52% of your income, you must be earning more than you are saying to be left with your protected income