Challenging bureaucracy and upholding my right to protect my information.

deary65

ben500 wrote: »

I didn't say the particular "mindset" was restricted to dwp it isn't.

You will find you are dealing with people who take things personally, they follow rules and regulations like sheeple.;)

zappster1966

Your last post is numbered 666.

That means God loves the Department for Work & Pensions & all it's employees :rotfl:

Pwned (big time lol)

Oldernotwiser

mouseymousey99 wrote: »

When you go around waving your sword of justice do be careful you know what you are talking about.........

And don't cut yourself with it!

Conor_3

Oldernotwiser wrote:

And don't cut yourself with it

You'll love this.....


To zootet and the Ben500 moron....

Social Security (Claims and Payments Regulations)
Evidence and information
7.—(1) Every person who makes a claim for benefit shall furnish such certificates, documents, information and evidence in connection with the claim, or any question arising out of it, as may be required by the Secretary of State and shall do so within one month of being required to do so or such longer period as the Secretary of State may consider reasonable.

Regulation 4:
(6C) Where a person to whom paragraph (6A) applies makes a claim in accordance with paragraph (6B)(b), on receipt of the claim the local authority or other person specified in that sub-paragraph -

(a) shall forward the claim to the Secretary of State as soon as reasonably practicable;

(b) may receive information or evidence relating to the claim supplied by -

• (i) the person making, or who has made, the claim; or
  
  (ii) other persons in connection with the claim,

and shall forward it to the Secretary of State as soon as reasonably practicable;

(c) may obtain information or evidence relating to the claim from the person who has made the claim, but not any medical information or evidence except for that which the claimant must provide in accordance with instructions on the form, and shall forward the information or evidence to the Secretary of State as soon as reasonably practicable;
(d) may record information or evidence relating to the claim supplied or obtained in accordance with sub-paragraphs (b) or (c) and may hold the information or evidence (whether as supplied or obtained or as recorded) for the purpose of forwarding it to the Secretary of State; and

(e) may give information and advice with respect to the claim to the person who makes, or who has made, the claim.

Does your foot hurt after shooting yourself in it, zootet?

ben500

Which the op did, his objection was to the photocopying of such material which much as you would like it to be is not referenced in your post.

sharski

Telephone claims........ lie detector tests????

You've been watching too much James Bond, Buddy!!

healy

sharski wrote: »

Telephone claims........ lie detector tests????

You've been watching too much James Bond, Buddy!!

You are quite right about lie detectors but some voice recognition software has been trialed by some Councils, but none of this if used is admissable in a Court of Law.

healy

deary65 wrote: »

Your national insurance number is your contract with the state, it is what you pay into each month. You make out a statememt sign and date it, then sent it to them. The telephone is all about the lie detecter test, although they don't tell people this.
As the OP says you make these stamements but you never produce evidence to back it up.

There are no lie detectors but see my post above.

zootet

Conor wrote: »

You'll love this.....
(d) may record information or evidence relating to the claim supplied or obtained in accordance with sub-paragraphs (b) or (c) and may hold the information or evidence (whether as supplied or obtained or as recorded) for the purpose of forwarding it to the Secretary of State;

Bank name: Nat West
Account number: 44444444
Account balance on XX/XX/XXXX date £300

Information that I provided -as requested by them- information that they recorded at my request. I just objected to their proposed method of recording and suggested an alternative. I still satisfied those regulations Conor. There was a lot of other superflous and private information on those documents that they are not entitled to see.

Does your foot hurt after shooting yourself in it, zootet?

Not at all.

ben500

zootet wrote: »

Bank name: Nat West
Account number: 44444444
Account balance on XX/XX/XXXX date £300

Information that I provided -as requested by them- information that they recorded at my request. I just objected to their proposed method of recording and suggested an alternative. I still satisfied those regulations Conor. There was a lot of other superflous and private information on those documents that they are not entitled to see.


Not at all.

Yes but Conor's post was much bigger than yours