Money Moral Dilemma: Is it fair to redistribute my kids' cash equally?

If the amounts differ then I would assume the ages differ as some would have more from when they were born and as such I would say no they get to suit their age.
If this is the case they get at the same age so one will get now the others when they reach the same age.
Or that's the was it was when I was growing up, but hey I even hear all siblings get on ones birthdays now a days. Can they not wait until it is their turn?

If we are talking of small sums given to them for birthdays etc. I wouldn't. If it's something more substantial and there is a significant difference (e.g. a relative has gifted you 500£ upon the birth of your first child and 300£ on the birth of the second, and you are saving these amounts for them), then yes, I think it would only be fair.

If it were me I would be inclined to distribute it evenly but on a set birthday. So if the balance currently totals £9K, then everyone on their 16/17/18 birthday gets £3K each.

This is provided the children are all full siblings, if they're not and there's money been given by one's birth father or whatever then you would be wrong to take from that cash.

xxx

It is quite clear it is not fair to reallocate gifts - they were given specifically to each child.
If one saves all that money oneself one can reshaffle it as one pleases , but this was money given specifically to each child by third parties

Unless they are twins/triplets/quads/quins etc., it's fair to assume that the difference in savings at this time relates directly to the number of birthdays/christmases they've been alive for.

Surely it should pretty much even out in the end? If you take money away from older ones now the younger ones will eventually end up with more than their older siblings. Not much fairness there.