PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A Tenant's guide to renting

Options
1323335373854

Comments

  • We have just viewed a property to rent and received the LAs terms and conditions. The up front non refundable arrangement fee is 30% of one months rent + VAT + £35 per adult tenant. It strikes me as a large sum of money effectively additional commission for the LA.
    Are these amounts of money normal or is there a wide variation?
  • Dear JoeA81

    About 3 months ago I rented a property and have taken your advice about trying to find out the mortgage status of the property.

    This has not been easy and has taken considerable time, however I discovered a couple of weeks ago that number 2 on your list is no longer necessary.

    This is because on 1st October 2010 a new law came into force giving tenants more protection even if they are in a property where the landlord does not have a buy to let mortgage.

    For more information, please see:

    propertypsl.co.uk/node/478

    I also discovered that even if the landlord has a buy to let mortgage, he/she may not have obtained the lenders consent to rent to an individiual or group and therefore is no different to a landlord who does not have a buy to let mortgage.

    To avoid wasting tenants time in the future, I would respectfully request that you remove this item from your otherwise excellent advice.

    Many thanks
  • missminx
    missminx Posts: 947 Forumite
    Can anyone tell me if it is our responsibility to put reasonable insullation in the loft, or the landlord's please?
    We have a 6 month standard short hold tenancy. Trying to improve heating economy as their decrepit boiler is not economical at all!!!
    Still looking for the plot...... Anyone seen it???
  • Very good post!
    Can anyone help, my letting agency is all of a sudden trying to charge me a 3% charge for paying on a debit card? Can they do this?
    Thanks
  • Hi everyone, I'm a newbie on here too.

    Currently renting a house through a letting agency. The other day we had a house inspection, and the woman from the agency just kept going on about the condensation on the windows and the black on the wooden frames, (although it's not as bad as she made out!:mad:). Made me feel rubbish and that I wasn't looking after the place, although I do my best to wipe away water and clean windows when I can.

    They told me in a letter that if we didn't do something about it, then we would get charged when we move out (off our deposit). I'm going to paint all the frames with anti-mould paint, but I do think that the landlady is legally responsible for sorting this problem out, so why should I have to end up having less of a deposit in the end? Has anyone had a similar problem?

    Thanks
  • Wings
    Wings Posts: 190 Forumite
    mrs_hsp wrote: »
    Hi everyone, I'm a newbie on here too.

    Currently renting a house through a letting agency. The other day we had a house inspection, and the woman from the agency just kept going on about the condensation on the windows and the black on the wooden frames, (although it's not as bad as she made out!:mad:). Made me feel rubbish and that I wasn't looking after the place, although I do my best to wipe away water and clean windows when I can.

    They told me in a letter that if we didn't do something about it, then we would get charged when we move out (off our deposit). I'm going to paint all the frames with anti-mould paint, but I do think that the landlady is legally responsible for sorting this problem out, so why should I have to end up having less of a deposit in the end? Has anyone had a similar problem?

    Thanks

    Mould due to damp/condensation due to lack off circulation and ventilation, so doors and windows open, move furniture slightly away from walls. Treat mould with weak soluction of household bleach. Common problem this time of the year, heating turned up and windows closed.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    etty1987 wrote: »
    Very good post!
    Can anyone help, my letting agency is all of a sudden trying to charge me a 3% charge for paying on a debit card? Can they do this?
    Thanks
    Yes, they can. They get charged for using the bank/car company infrastructure for processing the payment and can pass that card on to you. Shops don't tend to pass these charges on direct to the customer but instead build those costs into their prices.

    What is it that you are you paying with your card? Do the LA office still accept cheques?
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    GoodTenant wrote: »
    Dear JoeA81

    About 3 months ago I rented a property and have taken your advice about trying to find out the mortgage status of the property.

    This has not been easy and has taken considerable time, however I discovered a couple of weeks ago that number 2 on your list is no longer necessary.

    This is because on 1st October 2010 a new law came into force giving tenants more protection even if they are in a property where the landlord does not have a buy to let mortgage.

    For more information, please see:

    xxxxxxxxxxxx

    I also discovered that even if the landlord has a buy to let mortgage, he/she may not have obtained the lenders consent to rent to an individiual or group and therefore is no different to a landlord who does not have a buy to let mortgage.

    To avoid wasting tenants time in the future, I would respectfully request that you remove this item from your otherwise excellent advice.

    Many thanks
    Thanks for your post. Despite the Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants etc) Act 2010 it is still worthwhile a T checking out the mortgage status of the potential LL from the start. LLs who fail to have CTL are also likely to fail to meet other LL obligations. LLs seek much information on their prospective Ts and it is equally important that prospective Ts do their research.

    As a newbie poster you perhaps haven't realised that you should not use the forum to promote your own website. See Forum Rules up above.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    Just a reminder to posters that they are will get a better response to specific queries if they hit the "New Thread" button top left of screen (from main HBR&S board) to create a thread of their own. :smiley:
  • JoeA81
    JoeA81 Posts: 266 Forumite
    edited 29 December 2010 at 3:22PM
    GoodTenant wrote: »
    Dear JoeA81

    About 3 months ago I rented a property and have taken your advice about trying to find out the mortgage status of the property.

    This has not been easy and has taken considerable time, however I discovered a couple of weeks ago that number 2 on your list is no longer necessary.

    This is because on 1st October 2010 a new law came into force giving tenants more protection even if they are in a property where the landlord does not have a buy to let mortgage.

    For more information, please see:

    propertypsl.co.uk/node/478

    I also discovered that even if the landlord has a buy to let mortgage, he/she may not have obtained the lenders consent to rent to an individiual or group and therefore is no different to a landlord who does not have a buy to let mortgage.

    To avoid wasting tenants time in the future, I would respectfully request that you remove this item from your otherwise excellent advice.

    Many thanks
    tbs624 wrote: »
    Thanks for your post. Despite the Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants etc) Act 2010 it is still worthwhile a T checking out the mortgage status of the potential LL from the start. LLs who fail to have CTL are also likely to fail to meet other LL obligations. LLs seek much information on their prospective Ts and it is equally important that prospective Ts do their research.

    As a newbie poster you perhaps haven't realised that you should not use the forum to promote your own website. See Forum Rules up above.

    I think I agree with tbs624, and MissMoneypenny's long running sticky thread on the subject seem to suggest that this is still something that Tenants should be aware of.

    It does however strike me that I first started this thread back in 2008, and many things have changed since then. Is there anything else that anyone has spotted in the OP that may need to be updated?
    Don't pay off your student loan quicker than you have to.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.