We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
phorm/webwise
Options
Comments
-
Phorm and its relevant advertising feature that is part of the Webwise phishing warning system is something that has generated many column inches around the main broadband news sites and blogs.
News has just reached us that Kent Ertugrul the Phorm CEO will be online between 8:30pm and 9:30pm this evening to take part in an online chat at www.webwise.com/chat.0 -
*!*HIBS*!* wrote: »More info from here: http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/3448-phorm-ceo-to-do-live-online-chat.html
For those who dont know PHORM will be spying upon the internet users of BT, talk talk, Virgin Media see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/04/phorm_ripa/ If you want to sign the petition to Gordon Brown see http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/ispphorm/ It looks like BT trialed PHORM in July of 2007 giving a third party (PHORM created by a known malware author) access to BT's customers browsing data0 -
yes, ive read up on this before, facebook were thinking about using it but i think in this weeks news they said no (i may stand corrected)....what i dont understand is if social networking sites and isp are looking into phorm..does this mean we'll be phormed twice?Bring back mark and lard NOW! or else (please) clique member no. 10 :j
"When a woman steals your man,there is no better revenge than to let her keep him"
I maybe blonde, have many moments and have big bazookas but my brain is in gear0 -
:spam: Poster reported£2 Coins Savings Club 2012 is £4
.............................NCFC member No: 00005.........
......................................................................TCNC member No: 00008
NPFM 210 -
does this mean we'll be phormed twice?
i wont! i don't use facebook etc. and i have a decent ispUtinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.0 -
oopps..is this spam
im usually good at spotting
Bring back mark and lard NOW! or else (please) clique member no. 10 :j
"When a woman steals your man,there is no better revenge than to let her keep him"
I maybe blonde, have many moments and have big bazookas but my brain is in gear0 -
snails's_pace wrote: »oopps..is this spam
im usually good at spotting
Spam or not, i think its something to watch. If they do sell info on our web-surfing habits are they gonna give us a slice of the profits or reduce how much we have to pay for the ISP as without us they would'nt make any money.
Also i have concerns about my rights to privacey.If i could i would, but i cannot so i wont, but maybe one day i will.0 -
The_Economist wrote: »Spam or not, i think its something to watch. If they do sell info on our web-surfing habits are they gonna give us a slice of the profits or reduce how much we have to pay for the ISP as without us they would'nt make any money.
Also i have concerns about my rights to privacey.
yes me too, ive signed the petition a while back, what with dna database,phorming we really do have to stand up for our human rightsBring back mark and lard NOW! or else (please) clique member no. 10 :j
"When a woman steals your man,there is no better revenge than to let her keep him"
I maybe blonde, have many moments and have big bazookas but my brain is in gear0 -
I know it's not really a money saving subject, but I'm still amazed at the lack of interest in this story on this board.
Anyway, here's the latest on the attempts to stop BT, Talk Talk and Virgin using Phorm to illegally invade our privacy in an attempt to sell advertising.
"The Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR) has today sent the Home Office in-depth legal analysis of the Phorm behavioural advertising system. The analysis has been produced by FIPR’s General Counsel (and ORG Advisory Council member) Nicholas Bohm, and complements the technical analysis produced by Richard Clayton earlier this month. The analysis shows that Phorm’s systems involve interception of communications contrary to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, fraud, contrary to the Fraud Act, and therefore unlawful processing of personal data, contrary to the Data Protection Act. It states that individual directors and managers of the Internet Service Providers involved could be criminally liable for these offences, if roll out of Phorm goes ahead."
Full story: http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2008/04/23/fipr-calls-on-home-office-to-withdraw-misleading-advice-on-phorm/Last ciggie - 28/01/2012 :dance:
If you are not paying for it, you're not the customer; you're the product being sold.0 -
It a bit like my thread on the 10p tax, people tend not to take any notice until they are personally affected.
Skyuser has a No to Phorm banner on the homepage.
Needs a 'Sun' headline maybe.
Internet users surfing details flogged to advertisers.That gum you like is coming back in style.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards