📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

UC review (Again)

13

Comments

  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 5,992
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Ambassador

    Yes, I saw that online, which is what alerted me to my mistake.

    I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.
  • Robbie64
    Robbie64 Posts: 2,459
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I did think there were contract workers as I could remember reading the news story you linked to but I couldn't recall the specifics. It's interesting that the DWP are ditching the contract, as posted by HSB. I wonder why that is happening?

  • Newcad
    Newcad Posts: 2,154
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 2 October at 4:45PM

    So, the (unsatisfactory) contracted out telephone jockeys / reviewers will still be the same people and will still be getting things wrong.

    They are just being "inboarded" so they are employed and paid by the DWP directly instead of the DWP paying a third party to employ/pay them.

    In other words the DWP are cutting out the middle man, it's a cost cutting excercise.

    From Rightsnet: https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/now/post/72777

    Throughout the duration of the contract frustrated members working for DWP on TCRs have told PCS that it wasn't working, that handovers from the private sector were not in good shape and created extra work for DWP staff. In the meantime, Teleperformance were able to reap the benefits of what was an initial £368 million contract presented to them in 2024.

  • tomxlisa
    tomxlisa Posts: 604
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite

    Spoke to the compliance officer today and as I’m still unwell and recently suffering a bereavement I’ve asked to push it forward again, he’s told me that it can’t be pushed forward any longer and that my payments will be suspended until I’ve had the phone call with him and provided bank statements, having looked online it does say that this shouldn’t be the case as being not well and suffering a recent bereavement is a good cause but I’ve told him that and he said it’s been pushed forward enough, admittedly he has rescheduled the call several times but I’m very sick right now and with the bereavement my head isn’t in the right place for the call at the moment, is there anything I can do to stop the payment getting suspended, he seems to think not even though what I’m going through as he says it’s been rescheduled enough times but surely there isn’t a limit on illness and getting over a recent loss?.

  • tomxlisa
    tomxlisa Posts: 604
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite

    Anyone give me some advice on this please?.

  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 7,184
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    Forumite

    i feel it's a tough position, the DWP think there might be some issue with your claim so want to investigate it. From their side they are continuing to pay you knowing this. There comes a point that they can't continue when they payment might not be correct.

    Not sure even it would work but could you get a note from dr saying to are currently unfit to deal with it.

    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • Muttleythefrog
    Muttleythefrog Posts: 20,757
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 15 October at 9:27PM

    My concern here is that the efforts to circumnavigate a fairly routine matter is creating you potentially more difficulty and distress than just dealing with it. There isn't anything you've mentioned that causes concern about your claim and so I would hope after quick investigation they'll find all correct.

    I'm conscious you've said " im a massive worrier and suffer with mental health bad so now im just thinking ive done something wrong even though I haven’t just doubting myself on everything" as this is extremely familiar to me… I even struggle with shops because I'm convinced I'll be accused of shoplifting… something I know I haven't done. However my reaction is to aggressively deal with the issue causing the worry.. that included in past a DWP in person interview (more serious than anything here it appears) about undeclared capital that they accepted was based on wrong information they had… I gave them the entire output of transactions start to finish for the closed account they identified as holding a tidy fortune but never had more than around £3k in…. and I wonder if this strategy would also serve you best… face the requirement and get it off your shoulders… off your mind. They're not going to conduct a general knowledge quiz where you definitely won't know some answers… this is simply about your circumstances and statements… you're the expert… and they have a job to do.

    "Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack
  • tomxlisa
    tomxlisa Posts: 604
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite

    I’ve just looked on my journal online and it says (allegation of excess capital above UC thresholds) so I’m guessing someone has said I’ve got millions in the bank or something like that, I wish I had.

  • Muttleythefrog
    Muttleythefrog Posts: 20,757
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 17 October at 2:14PM

    Even more reason to deal with this ASAP… you know what they're looking for to check an allegation and it won't exist… ultimately you can prove that…and in any call prior to statements you can perhaps just be ready to give them the maximum you've held in total capital in say the last year…that would be a very direct response….e.g 'In the last year the maximum capital I've held at any point was £4850 and that was across my bank account x and my savings account y… specify what statements you want to see (if they haven't already stated) and you will get'

    "Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack
  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 7,184
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    Forumite

    I agree with the above, now it's due to a possible capital issue they can't keep on paying you.
    Have you got or had any ISAs? as can be (wrongly) flagged.

    Let's Be Careful Out There
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.