We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Top Regular Savers Discussion Thread

1546547548549550552»

Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 30,564 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 6 September at 7:44PM

    Or you could just let them know you are unsatisfied with their handling of the existing complaint, with a view to eliciting a final response so you can escalate.

    The main issue here, as I see it, is not that a payment was randomly selected for closer scrutiny, which can happen at any time, it is the fact that a specific payee was repeatedly singled out after you had already satisfied them it was genuine (and have your own proof that the funds successfully arrived). The effect of which is that they are failing to observe proper standards of market conduct by interfering with your consumer relationship with one of their competitiors. Whether that is deliberate or inadvertent.

  • ForumUser7
    ForumUser7 Posts: 2,628 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    They state they do not operate any call centres outside of mainland UK. In previous years I've been advised of the opposite. However, I wonder if it is some clever attempt to side step the outsourcing question. You said you thought it was outsourced, they said they don't operate any call centre outside of mainland UK, however if it was outsourced, do they really operate it? Perhaps a conversation for another thread if members want to dig into this point further, especially in light of recent comments, but thought it was worth briefly noting.

    If you want me to definitely see your reply, please tag me @forumuser7 Thank you.

    N.B. (Amended from Forum Rules): You must investigate, and check several times, before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my content, as nothing I post is advice, rather it is personal opinion and is solely for discussion purposes. I research before my posts, and I never intend to share anything that is misleading, misinforming, or out of date, but don't rely on everything you read. Some of the information changes quickly, is my own opinion or may be incorrect. Verify anything you read before acting on it to protect yourself because you are responsible for any action you consequently make... DYOR, YMMV etc.
  • friolento
    friolento Posts: 4,178 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic

    Odd. I don't use Virgin much and have never noticed any delays. I opened a new RS on Sept 1, and as CoP didn't work, made my first deposit via my Virgin current account. All happened on Sept 1, I didn't notice any pending amounts, and didn't get any warnings. My Virgin sort code starts with 82, is yours different?

    virg.png
  • Eco_Miser
    Eco_Miser Posts: 5,147 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    That's strange. I've had my VM current account since 1971 (it was Yorkshire bank then, same sort code & account number); I frequently move thousands into the CA and immediately (the time taken to log out of the sending bank and log into VM) out again, and I've never noticed a pending status, and certainly never was threatened with overdraft charges. Sometimes the transaction isn't listed but the balance is correctly updated, and onward movement is still possible.

    Eco Miser
    Saving money for well over half a century
  • I've never had any issues and I tend to put funds in the current account immediately before I transfer to the RS.

    I do with most and so far not had any problems.

    I know Santander can be weird after 'trading hours' but none of the others.

  • allegro120
    allegro120 Posts: 2,735 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper

    Virgin

    I have both, 82 and 05. There's no difference in ways they operate. I always make my first deposits via current account. Can't remember if the money show "pending", but internal transfers were always immediate.

  • DealSeeker11
    DealSeeker11 Posts: 45 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited Today at 12:46AM

    VIRGIN

    Yes mine is the same as yours, M Plus Current account with 82.

    I thought exactly the same as @MASONIC said, why was I allowed to transfer the money out if I didn’t have the fund cleared already? The transfer out transaction was also immediate and arrived in the other bank at the same time without any issues.

    The pending status lasted for 3 days, it was also during weekend so maybe that had something to do with it, although still made no sense to me.

    Don’t want to go off topic, but if you’re transferring money out of your VM current account, whether it’s external or internal, check and make sure you don’t have pending funds in your account first.

  • VIRGIN

    When this happened to me I seriously thought it was just me until I read others’ posts about their pending transactions last couple of days.

    Glad you don’t have this problem, but I sure am not going to risk it again…

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.9K Life & Family
  • 263.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.