We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Top Regular Savers Discussion Thread

1394395396397398400»

Comments

  • gpman
    gpman Posts: 837 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper

    "Also, it may happen some day that a good savings product will be offered to existing members but only those who cast a vote in the last AGM."

    Unlikely, imho.

    Most BS (& I'm sure that includes MBS) use an independent, third party election scrutineer to manage AGM ballots.

    The BS only usually receives aggregated results of each ballot from the independent scrutineer.

    I think the poster originally asking about this was suggesting they, as a shareholder, could propose a motion at the AGM to be put to the vote to force the BS to offer a high paying account. Whilst a shareholder can usually ask a question, or otherwise make a comment at an AGM (or sometimes by post in advance), getting a motion proposed & agreed and put to the vote at an AGM is something quite different.

  • flaneurs_lobster
    flaneurs_lobster Posts: 11,401 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    While active membership participation is always encouraged by the BSs (presumably for marketing purposes - an engaged member is always more likely to save/borrow from their "own" Society) I can't see them introducing preferential products just for "active" members - would be divisive, would add admin and would only last a year before the majority of members clued-up and all voted in the next AGM round just to get the perk.

  • happybagger
    happybagger Posts: 1,363 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Given that members resolutions need to be signed by 500 members, and the society won't/can't release members names and addresses, members resolutions are nigh on impossible anyway.

    The illusion of democracy.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.