Being nosey... How many Regular Saver accounts do you have?

Kim_13

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81875831#Comment_81875831

It may be more difficult to achieve, but unless those tied on RS numbers are equally grouped into 2 (current 2 and 3 on 65 RS) and so on, this is unfair in that someone's position can be downgraded based on the alphabetical position of their username. As monthly contribution + value are not obligatory, something that has nothing to do with RS at all can end up being the tiebreaker.

Whether the next figure used after joint 2nd is 3rd or 4th is another matter.

Bobblehat

@MaxBlax … I like it … and the other tweaks you've done! The latest update now includes a "Weighted Average" column, as requested by a few contributors … that is pending publishing and hopefully will appear soon.

I am wondering if the ROW column could get confused with a "chart position" …. i.e. 1st, joint 2nd, 3rd ….or joint 9th …. which is something I've also been hesitant to introduce?

I'll see what comments transpire and act accordingly. 😀

topyam

Update table now on the first page folks

Bobblehat

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81875838#Comment_81875838

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81875841#Comment_81875841

Comments noted ….. that is why, up to now, I have been hesitant to introduce any sort of numbering, or ranking which a "number" could be confused with. I fully understand how some contributors may not wish to be given a "positional" number, even though the reality of a table would imply one! The LT needs to be kept fun above all.

I think different viewers are using the statistics in different ways …. and that's perfectly fine. My original idea of producing the table was simply to put all the information from multiple messages in one neat place … no more than that. Of course, helpful comments have suggested amendments to the table, some of which I've implemented (and some I haven't). Thanks for staying on board during the journey 😀

subjecttocontract

As there is no way I will ever be first and no prestige coming further down the ranking Id be very, very happy, no ecstatic, if I could be ranked last with nothing......what would I need to do to achieve such a prestigious position in the ranking ? 😀😀

Im happy to change my user name so it starts with a Z if that helps.

Bobblehat

You've made it 😀😀😀 …. by virtue of "s" coming after "M"! It looks like I accidentally overwrote your entry on the last update … fully restored now after Malchester … apologies!

Let's hope any forum members beginning with ZZ don't contribute with zero RSs just to spoil your prestigious position … or I'll have to resort to skulduggery!

Let me know if you ever succumb to a "must not miss RS" 😀

subjecttocontract

Fabulous, I'm off to the pub to celebrate.

Archerychick

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81875844#Comment_81875844

I would be grateful if you would remove me from your league table. Wasn’t aware this would be consolidated from a thread comment. Thank you

Bobblehat

@Archerychick

No problem. Your stats will disappear after the next update. You may wish to delete your original message dated 2nd October 2025 (page 4) if you require privacy.

For future reference to forumites, I assume that by sending a comment containing your RS statistics to this publicly read thread started by @topyam …. titled …

Being nosey... How many Regular Saver accounts do you have?

that you are implicitly happy for those stats to be included in the table! Of course, if you indicate otherwise, I'll happily follow your instructions 😀

clairec666

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81876237#Comment_81876237

Perhaps worth @topyam editing the first post to make it clear that "comment = league table entry"?

Or alternatively, don't automatically include people in the league table unless they specify that they want to be part of it?