How to proceed? Any advice and guidance is very welcome. Demand for medical evidence by UKPC.

Kaizen2024

People with reduced mobility are not exempt from the requirement to park correctly; hence why it is necessary evidence why you failed to park correctly between the lines and potentially prevent wheel chair access for the neighbouring BB bay (unless the landowner is a soft touch that is).

ChirpyChicken

Kaizen2024 said:

People with reduced mobility are not exempt from the requirement to park correctly; hence why it is necessary evidence why you failed to park correctly between the lines and potentially prevent wheel chair access for the neighbouring BB bay (unless the landowner is a soft touch that is).

How on earth is the OP supposed to have evidenced a medical episode.  In most cases not really possibly.
Luckily landowners dont really view things in the way parking firms do and that is why you don't like landowners instructing parking firms to cancel tickets.

Kaizen2024

ChirpyChicken said:

Kaizen2024 said:

People with reduced mobility are not exempt from the requirement to park correctly; hence why it is necessary evidence why you failed to park correctly between the lines and potentially prevent wheel chair access for the neighbouring BB bay (unless the landowner is a soft touch that is).

How on earth is the OP supposed to have evidenced a medical episode.  In most cases not really possibly.
Luckily landowners dont really view things in the way parking firms do and that is why you don't like landowners instructing parking firms to cancel tickets.

Evidence of the condition the OP has referred to and a witness statement (and VRM) from the person who assisted them would be a start.

ChirpyChicken

Kaizen2024 said:

ChirpyChicken said:

Kaizen2024 said:

People with reduced mobility are not exempt from the requirement to park correctly; hence why it is necessary evidence why you failed to park correctly between the lines and potentially prevent wheel chair access for the neighbouring BB bay (unless the landowner is a soft touch that is).

How on earth is the OP supposed to have evidenced a medical episode.  In most cases not really possibly.
Luckily landowners dont really view things in the way parking firms do and that is why you don't like landowners instructing parking firms to cancel tickets.

Evidence of the condition the OP has referred to and a witness statement (and VRM) from the person who assisted them would be a start.

Luckily landowners (mostly) are not cut from the same cloth as parking firms

Half_way

if a car is slightly over a line, or a tyre is touching it makes nit one bit of difference im  most cases

Likewise if a car has to park cross two bays to facilitate a disabled persons  getting in and out/accessing the vehicle (this would be a reasonable  adjustment) and there was no other available areas to access the vehicle.

the only ones that kick up a fuss are the vultures/scum in the parking industry

Kaizen2024

Half_way said:

if a car is slightly over a line, or a tyre is touching it makes nit one bit of difference im  most cases

Likewise if a car has to park cross two bays to facilitate a disabled persons  getting in and out/accessing the vehicle (this would be a reasonable  adjustment) and there was no other available areas to access the vehicle.

the only ones that kick up a fuss are the vultures/scum in the parking industry

Noted; however, not relevant to this case.

Nellymoser

Kaizen2024 said:

fisherjim said:

I think you are losing the plot here literally!

Not at all, I am just not so naive at to believe everything I’m told is the truth. 

I have seen all sorts of stories fabricated, even from men of the cloth; only to be disproved by CCTV footage from within the car park e.g “I was waiting for a space and gave up and left” whilst the footage shows a half empty car park and the driver park up and go to a nearby shop. 

Good to know car park CCTV footage is available as proof. Oh yes we've seen evidence on here of many PP managed car parks half empty, sad the landowner is losing out on the parking tariff.

It's obvious @Kaizen2024 is a regular reader of posts here. Does he/she agree that the images posted of letters from PP firms, debt agencies and legals contain lies and fabricated statements?

Kaizen2024

It's obvious @Kaizen2024 is a regular reader of posts here. Does he/she agree that the images posted of letters from PP firms, debt agencies and legals contain lies and fabricated statements?

Impossible to say. I never take anyone’s word for anything and we only see one side of the story here. 

Coupon-mad

Kaizen2024 said:

It's obvious @Kaizen2024 is a regular reader of posts here. Does he/she agree that the images posted of letters from PP firms, debt agencies and legals contain lies and fabricated statements?

Impossible to say. I never take anyone’s word for anything and we only see one side of the story here. 

As do the parking industry when cooking up their next excuses for bulk PCN flow, enabled by taking a hatchet to the 2022 CoP and calling their altered crap 'the Joint Code'.

I don't believe everything I read either. 

KittenChops

Kaizen2024 said:

People with reduced mobility are not exempt from the requirement to park correctly; hence why it is necessary evidence why you failed to park correctly between the lines and potentially prevent wheel chair access for the neighbouring BB bay (unless the landowner is a soft touch that is).

If you had bothered to read & understand the OP's post about the particular medical episode that occurred - you might have realised that wasn't necessarily due to reduced mobility...
(OP - you have my deepest sympathy/empathy for your condition - I don't think I would have been able to park nearly as well as you did had that been me)