DCB Legal bites the dust again for 3 PCNs and told to pay Defendant’s court costs @ hearing on 25/03

1505grandad

Most Some of the photos are dated 2021  -  are they dated and time stamped relevant to the parking events?

Kayce_Dutton

The accused breaches were May 2022, so they are not.

Car1980

Sent you a message.

Kayce_Dutton

Thanks both for helping with this. I have updated the doc: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1ved4f8ffheesnz2g6119/WS.docx?rlkey=v7eylqq2ytd2qtky3ue14i9fo&st=lursonmi&dl=0

1505grandad

Para 27  -  did you mean to include this para re Chan case?

Kayce_Dutton

1505grandad said:

Para 27  -  did you mean to include this para re Chan case?

No I proof read everything, and missed it. Thanks for spotting. Assume it needs to be removed?

Kayce_Dutton

I'm assuming everyone had reviewed it now, and it's ready to go. What time would people recommend sending it across?

Kayce_Dutton

WS submitted. Thanks all!

Kayce_Dutton

With the hearing in 5 days, I have just received a supplementary WS from the claimant. Is this allowed because the original order said it had to file no later than 14 days before the hearing?

Is there anything I should do like request the courts to not accept it?


https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/18u2kyejf6ztygzomljhz/121128-7019D-20-03-25-Pag.pdf?rlkey=e5tgsr37vd1q9yqzwsetvkopw&st=8byy7qb9&dl=0

Car1980

As long as they have got the main one in on the deadline, either side can submit supplementary statements (or send anything to the judge, as long as the other side also receives it).

There is a risk though - annoying the judge with ping pong statements, or as in this case, saying absolutely nothing of any substance.

No idea why they bothered with this. It doesn't add anything new.