Nottingham Building Society - new logo and branding

13567

Comments

  • OP update with the reasoning behind the change 

    What an absolute mess
    All tied up in Notts. 😀
  • WillPS said:
    Interesting that they've gone back to being Nottingham BS rather than 'The Nottingham'. I also can't see any imagery of Robin Hood, not sure when the last time that was but this was the logo I grew up with:


    Presumably they didn't want to drop Beehive until they'd made the parent brand a bit less stuffy?

    What matters ultimately is the rates, hopefully there'll be something eyecatching when they bring over Beehive. Hopefully they take the opportunity to update their branch shopfronts too, many of which still have wording suggesting they offer Estate Agency services.
    Adding BS is very apt.
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • nbrewitt
    nbrewitt Posts: 76 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    You'll be telling us next that Coventry BS will be getting rid of Lady Godiva from their branding lol
  • nottsphil
    nottsphil Posts: 667 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 10 October 2024 at 3:59PM

    Nottingham Building Society - Drops Robin Hood for 'not being inclusive enough'

    Although a better reason is that he was most likely not from Nottingham anyway !
    I'm guessing you're from Yorkshire.
    Hands off, he's one of our own!

    Nobody has explained why he contradicts inclusivity though, but I think I know the reason.
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 9,303 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    nottsphil said:

    Nobody has explained why he contradicts inclusivity though, but I think I know the reason.
    The headline actually says 'financially inclusive' - and I can kind of see their point.  Robbing the rich is clear discrimination, and probably not something you want to be associated with when you want to encourage 'the rich' to deposit money with you.

    Also must be something in the FCA rules about financial service providers not associating themselves with financial crime?
  • Section62 said:
    The headline actually says 'financially inclusive' - and I can kind of see their point.  Robbing the rich is clear discrimination, and probably not something you want to be associated with when you want to encourage 'the rich' to deposit money with you.

    Also must be something in the FCA rules about financial service providers not associating themselves with financial crime?
    I expect they will see an upsurge in deposits as the wealthy won't have to lookout for a man on horseback with a bow & arrow.
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • mikb
    mikb Posts: 626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    gt94sss2 said:
    The colour scheme is one thing but what's going on with fonts. Both Nottingham and Lloyds seem to be choosing fonts which are harder to read than their predecessors.

    As a sidenote, interesting how Nottingham have decided to emphasis they are a Building Society - exactly what Nationwide moved away from in their recent scheme..

    From a readability point of view, choosing to make some letters inconsistent within a font is a bad idea. Sure it looks kool and funky and whatever marketing has said, but it is horrible to read. Might as well switch over to "ransom paste" for a truly iconic unreadable look. Urgh.

  • nottsphil said:

    Nottingham Building Society - Drops Robin Hood for 'not being inclusive enough'

    Although a better reason is that he was most likely not from Nottingham anyway !
    I'm guessing you're from Yorkshire.
    Hands off, he's one of our own!

    Nobody has explained why he contradicts inclusivity though, but I think I know the reason.
    Me too. The elephant in the room.
  • Section62 said:
    nottsphil said:

    Nobody has explained why he contradicts inclusivity though, but I think I know the reason.
    The headline actually says 'financially inclusive' - and I can kind of see their point.  Robbing the rich is clear discrimination, and probably not something you want to be associated with when you want to encourage 'the rich' to deposit money with you.

    Also must be something in the FCA rules about financial service providers not associating themselves with financial crime?
    I think you (and they) are taking things a fair bit too literally and seriously. Modern Britain for you - everyone is yampy.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.