PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Septic tank (shared) upgrade - what would you do?

Options
1679111220

Comments

  • AJC211
    AJC211 Posts: 100 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes more explicit is probably wise. Thank you. I think they need to know that I am choosing not to go down the legal route, and if they want to kick up a fat fuss then we can all make things difficult for each other, but that’s ridiculous and let’s move on 🤞Unfortunately people like this never give up until they have what they want OR if they don’t, they exert their control over you in some other way, so I do need to pick my battles whilst advocating for myself. People eh?! This is why I have pets 😂
  • BonaDea
    BonaDea Posts: 208 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    I would replace the exclamation mark after 'logistics' with a full stop.  The exclamation mark makes you come across as a bit appeasing (rather than reasonable, which I think is what you're after).  
  • propertyrental
    propertyrental Posts: 3,391 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    I'd just stress 2 alternatives:
    1) if we install separate systems, then the easements (both yours and theirs) must be removed via a Deed of  Surrender, registered with LR, and all pipes will be removed from (my) garden
    2) however as it's likely the easement as written, and/or an easement of necessity or easement of common intention, remain valid on removal of the current system, then the existing pipes can/must remain in use and a new joint system installed that is acceptable to all.
    Either way, we can avoid costly legal fees by reaching one or other solution.

  • AJC211
    AJC211 Posts: 100 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    I'd just stress 2 alternatives:
    1) if we install separate systems, then the easements (both yours and theirs) must be removed via a Deed of  Surrender, registered with LR, and all pipes will be removed from (my) garden
    2) however as it's likely the easement as written, and/or an easement of necessity or easement of common intention, remain valid on removal of the current system, then the existing pipes can/must remain in use and a new joint system installed that is acceptable to all.
    Either way, we can avoid costly legal fees by reaching one or other solution.

    Oh thank you, you’ve put it much better than me! I actually don’t want a joint system after all this but the way you’ve put it is true and does at least give them a choice!
  • MeteredOut
    MeteredOut Posts: 3,037 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 25 June 2024 at 4:15PM
    AJC211 said:
    I'd just stress 2 alternatives:
    1) if we install separate systems, then the easements (both yours and theirs) must be removed via a Deed of  Surrender, registered with LR, and all pipes will be removed from (my) garden
    2) however as it's likely the easement as written, and/or an easement of necessity or easement of common intention, remain valid on removal of the current system, then the existing pipes can/must remain in use and a new joint system installed that is acceptable to all.
    Either way, we can avoid costly legal fees by reaching one or other solution.

    Oh thank you, you’ve put it much better than me! I actually don’t want a joint system after all this but the way you’ve put it is true and does at least give them a choice!
    If you think back when the issue first arose, if the neighbours had come to you and said "the existing system has issues/is not compliant, we need a replacement system, and the deeds state we need to each pay for it" (option 2 on your original post), it's likely you would have just agreed to it, as that is exactly what the easement is in place for.
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,216 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    My draft reply. I will probably send it at 11.59pm on Wednesday...(joking, I'm not that petty! I will probably put a holding reply over as I'm waiting for a quote)


    I believe with solicitors it's usually 5.29pm on Friday :)

  • AJC211
    AJC211 Posts: 100 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    AJC211 said:
    I'd just stress 2 alternatives:
    1) if we install separate systems, then the easements (both yours and theirs) must be removed via a Deed of  Surrender, registered with LR, and all pipes will be removed from (my) garden
    2) however as it's likely the easement as written, and/or an easement of necessity or easement of common intention, remain valid on removal of the current system, then the existing pipes can/must remain in use and a new joint system installed that is acceptable to all.
    Either way, we can avoid costly legal fees by reaching one or other solution.

    Oh thank you, you’ve put it much better than me! I actually don’t want a joint system after all this but the way you’ve put it is true and does at least give them a choice!
    If you think back when the issue first arose, if the neighbours had come to you and said "the existing system has issues/is not compliant, we need a replacement system, and the deeds state we need to each pay for it" (option 2 on your original post), it's likely you would have just agreed to it, as that is exactly what the easement is in place for.
    Exactly! I have spent 2 months saying, in person and in writing: We get 3 quotes to replace the system on the existing property, and agree on one, as per the easement (and I have lined up companies to provide quotes for exactly that). I have also said, in person and in writing, for 2 months, that I do not want any/all of a new system on my property. They, meanwhile, have spent the 2 months trying to get me to agree to exactly that, while lamenting how long the process has taken. Just bonkers! I am so done with the whole thing now
  • ThisIsWeird
    ThisIsWeird Posts: 7,935 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 26 June 2024 at 8:54AM
    Calm!
    You need to allow for, and be ready to accept, the original alternative, that of upgrading the existing system as it currently lies.
    Or, each to your own system - with no crossover.
    That's it - kiss.
    Both are ok. Nothing else is.
  • AJC211
    AJC211 Posts: 100 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Calm!
    You need to allow for, and be ready to accept, the original alternative, that of upgrading the existing system as it currently lies.
    Or, each to your own system - with no crossover.
    That's it - kiss.
    Both are ok. Nothing else is.
    Yes! Exactly this. Thank you ☺️
  • AJC211
    AJC211 Posts: 100 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Drum roll please….actually don’t bother! Another frustrating update.

    Neighbour A insisted I respond in 2 days to his email. I did. I received nothing in reply. Not even acknowledgement. Rude. But also lovely to have some peace 😂

    5 weeks later, I get an email from Neighbour A saying Neighbour C will soon be getting a new system (it’s a fairly easy off shoot from
    the existing shared system that’s in their garden). Neighbour A is hoping to join their system. 

    Neighbour A says he will “insisting on [his] current easement…as it pertains to the existing pipe work granting [him] access across [my front garden] from [his] property to the land of [Neighbour C’s property]”

    I’m getting legal advice. Slowly. It might take 5 weeks. 

    My take on things: If we replace the existing system, the old easement stands. If we get new system(s) in ANY form, then the old easement dies a death, so he doesn’t have easement rights across my land 🤔

    He has requested a face to face meeting I presume because he’s come up with another plan for a shared system and wants to walk through my land with me to show me where he wants it 🤔🤷‍♀️
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.