We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
E.ON frustration and surprise with bill
Comments
-
Cheers for this. Do you know if I retroactively add readings onto my e.on account online and give meter readings in such a way that I use less energy in the expensive months will a new bill be produced to reflect this?born_again said:
Well when you know prices are going up you can add some extra units on. So you get them @ the cheaper rate, then give a correct reading later.Godofgiants said:I also don't really understand how telling energy companies your meter readings work. In theory couldn't someone just say they took a reading and fiddle with it in such a way that they used less in the high charge months. Is it all just based on good faith?
Same when you know they are going down, give a lower reading & then a correct one after they have gone down, giving a cheaper rate for the units.
But you have to be aware, wont work with a smart meter passing readings on & should you do this when someone actually comes & reads the meter. It will catch you out.
But it's something you need to think about & do slowly over a period, as a big jump in usage just before a price rise, or reduction before cut may well flag on their systems.
So readings are on good faith. You just have to beware, playing the system can bite back.0 -
Yeah I absolutely wouldn't do this. I'd give an accurate kwh total use for my tenancy.Gerry1 said:
Don't be tempted to give a closing reading that's too low. It would be theft, and you'd be defrauding the next tenant or the landlord.Godofgiants said:
Not saying I am going to do this, but if I am renting and leaving in 2 months. I don't see how they could catch me out, especially with no evidence as to when I've used my energy, as the meter system is so outdated.Gerry1 said:No. Sooner or later you'd be caught out by a meter reader or The Mysterious Third Party.1 -
That could prove to be a very expensive error - which you will never repeat.Godofgiants said:
Yes, I absolutely know this now, but when I was first renting I just didn't think about this and that's my bad.
How do you know that the correct bill is £1100 ?Never pay on an estimated bill. Always read and understand your bill0 -
I would not. That would certainly get their interest. As to why you did not provide them at that point.Godofgiants said:
Cheers for this. Do you know if I retroactively add readings onto my e.on account online and give meter readings in such a way that I use less energy in the expensive months will a new bill be produced to reflect this?born_again said:
Well when you know prices are going up you can add some extra units on. So you get them @ the cheaper rate, then give a correct reading later.Godofgiants said:I also don't really understand how telling energy companies your meter readings work. In theory couldn't someone just say they took a reading and fiddle with it in such a way that they used less in the high charge months. Is it all just based on good faith?
Same when you know they are going down, give a lower reading & then a correct one after they have gone down, giving a cheaper rate for the units.
But you have to be aware, wont work with a smart meter passing readings on & should you do this when someone actually comes & reads the meter. It will catch you out.
But it's something you need to think about & do slowly over a period, as a big jump in usage just before a price rise, or reduction before cut may well flag on their systems.
So readings are on good faith. You just have to beware, playing the system can bite back.
Given EON are reducing prices from 1 July. They are asking for meter reading in the 5 days pre 1-7. You could submit a lower reading (But don't be stupidly low).
Just be aware you are in effect defrauding them. So this is not something I would advocate doing.
Far easier just to provide a reading each month, so you are only paying for what you use.Life in the slow lane0 -
I understand, however, morally, I do not have an issue, considering they would be charging me £8000 for a year's use of electricity for a 1 bed flat if I didn't have meter readings. I've only just got round to paying after 10 months and I did not realise you should be submitting meter readings monthly. It could be I've been taking meter readings and not submitting as I didn't know there was a place to do that. I actually have done this for Oct and have yet to submit this.born_again said:
I would not. That would certainly get their interest. As to why you did not provide them at that point.Godofgiants said:
Cheers for this. Do you know if I retroactively add readings onto my e.on account online and give meter readings in such a way that I use less energy in the expensive months will a new bill be produced to reflect this?born_again said:
Well when you know prices are going up you can add some extra units on. So you get them @ the cheaper rate, then give a correct reading later.Godofgiants said:I also don't really understand how telling energy companies your meter readings work. In theory couldn't someone just say they took a reading and fiddle with it in such a way that they used less in the high charge months. Is it all just based on good faith?
Same when you know they are going down, give a lower reading & then a correct one after they have gone down, giving a cheaper rate for the units.
But you have to be aware, wont work with a smart meter passing readings on & should you do this when someone actually comes & reads the meter. It will catch you out.
But it's something you need to think about & do slowly over a period, as a big jump in usage just before a price rise, or reduction before cut may well flag on their systems.
So readings are on good faith. You just have to beware, playing the system can bite back.
Given EON are reducing prices from 1 July. They are asking for meter reading in the 5 days pre 1-7. You could submit a lower reading (But don't be stupidly low).
Just be aware you are in effect defrauding them. So this is not something I would advocate doing.
Far easier just to provide a reading each month, so you are only paying for what you use.0 -
That's what they've given me on a bill today. I've told them the starting meter readings (from aug) and the meter reading from a couple of days ago. Their estimation of my kwh use was much higher than what it actually was, hence the reduction from 2500 to 1100.Robin9 said:
That could prove to be a very expensive error - which you will never repeat.Godofgiants said:
Yes, I absolutely know this now, but when I was first renting I just didn't think about this and that's my bad.
How do you know that the correct bill is £1100 ?0 -
Godofgiants said:
Thanks for explaining, so just to confirm (it's definitely epg as it's negative price on the bill), it's possible I don't get the full £400 as its dependent on use?CSI_Yorkshire said:
EPG discounts are discounts on the unit rates and not a fixed amount. These are the ones on your bill with negative prices for usage.Godofgiants said:
Thanks for your reply. I've looked into my bill in more detail and according to a govt page I was supposed to get £400 off bills for Oct-March but I only received £344 off . Any chance you know why that is? I can't post links, otherwise would link the page and a screenshot of my EPG discounts.CSI_Yorkshire said:The government discount on E.ON Next bills was usually shown as a second line for each bit of usage at a negative price.
You have had exactly the same cap applied to you as everyone else, it's just a little stranger how it applies to day/night tariffs. Obviously the overall cap doesn't apply to each rate individually, you have a higher day rate to go with the lower night rate, but the cap applies to a 'typical' pattern.
They 'jack up the prices' when energy is more expensive for them to buy, and their profits are capped.
The £400 was a different scheme, the EBSS, which was a fixed amount credited to your bill each month (based on who your supplier was on the 1st of each month). That will appear on the bill in the same place as your own direct debit contributions.
These are two things as I said. Don't confuse them.Gerry1 said:Everyone with an electricity account should have received payments of £66 and £67 totalling £400. Perhaps one is a bit late in showing up?
The negative prices one (EPG) had no limit and no expected amount. There is no "full £400" on that. You got what you got.
The £400 is different, and was £400 in credit onto your bill. Gerry1 is talking about this scheme but you asked about the other one.1 -
Ok i see but why am I entitled to the worse one over the other flat £400 off?CSI_Yorkshire said:Godofgiants said:
Thanks for explaining, so just to confirm (it's definitely epg as it's negative price on the bill), it's possible I don't get the full £400 as its dependent on use?CSI_Yorkshire said:
EPG discounts are discounts on the unit rates and not a fixed amount. These are the ones on your bill with negative prices for usage.Godofgiants said:
Thanks for your reply. I've looked into my bill in more detail and according to a govt page I was supposed to get £400 off bills for Oct-March but I only received £344 off . Any chance you know why that is? I can't post links, otherwise would link the page and a screenshot of my EPG discounts.CSI_Yorkshire said:The government discount on E.ON Next bills was usually shown as a second line for each bit of usage at a negative price.
You have had exactly the same cap applied to you as everyone else, it's just a little stranger how it applies to day/night tariffs. Obviously the overall cap doesn't apply to each rate individually, you have a higher day rate to go with the lower night rate, but the cap applies to a 'typical' pattern.
They 'jack up the prices' when energy is more expensive for them to buy, and their profits are capped.
The £400 was a different scheme, the EBSS, which was a fixed amount credited to your bill each month (based on who your supplier was on the 1st of each month). That will appear on the bill in the same place as your own direct debit contributions.
These are two things as I said. Don't confuse them.Gerry1 said:Everyone with an electricity account should have received payments of £66 and £67 totalling £400. Perhaps one is a bit late in showing up?
The negative prices one (EPG) had no limit and no expected amount. There is no "full £400" on that. You got what you got.
The £400 is different, and was £400 in credit onto your bill. Gerry1 is talking about this scheme but you asked about the other one.0 -
E.ON shares went up from 7.75 EUR in Oct to 12 EUR today. That's f***ing great for them, really happy to help them out.0
-
@GodofGiants
Put a date in your diary to read your meters every onth - don't forget water meter if you have one.Never pay on an estimated bill. Always read and understand your bill0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards