We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UC Managed Migration
Comments
-
There is no point really speculating but if you doubt NS-ESA will not be forced to claim UC, the White Paper about scrapping the WCA did explicitly say they're committed to keeping a contributory benefit. Which would be extremely difficult to merge with UC, much simpler and cheaper to just keep the separate benefit even if the rules for it have to change a little without a WCA.Newcad said:poppy12345 said:TimeLord1 said:Hi Poppy, yes I've been reading the legislation paper that was released, there's also a section that states we remain committed to ESA contribution related clients so by the time it becomes lawful or points made unlawful a lot could change. Hopefully those who are worried can stop stressing for now.
Those claiming Contirbutions based/New style ESA will never be migrated to UC anyway. Only those claiming Income Related will eventually be migrated across.Mmmm .......But I've already been warned here about commenting on government/DWP policy.You have to respect forum rules - so 'no comment'0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards