We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Claim from UKPC & DCB
Comments
-
TJB93LJB said:The case has been struck out before hearing 😀😀😀😀
The reasoning makes for some amusing reading -
"Particulars of claim are entirely inadaquate"
attached the letter for amusement (let me know if I should delete, blurred out identifying sections)
This is case 1, still to hear back on the second identical case.Do I need to do anything further?
cannot thank you all enough. Another win against these charlatans. It's time the courts starting clamping down on these w*nkers
"Particulars of claim are entirely inadaquate"
Assume the claim was signed by the one and only Yasmin Mia who is a legal working at DCBL. Assume Mia is registered with the SRA ?
But she signs a STATEMENT of truth which the court says ...
"Particulars of claim are entirely inadaquate"
All the rubbish we see from DCBL SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE SRA, if not, BY the MoJ
It's about time the courts order YASMIN MIA to answer FOR the fake claims she signs
1505grandad is right, Norwich court has woken up to the DCBL totally rubbish claims (especially the UKPC JUNK)
I am sure it will not be too long before all courts take action against DCBL FOR THEIR TIMEWASTING
"Particulars of claim are entirely inadaquate"
The order is to UKPC. WHO passed the claim to DCBL. it was DCBL who issued an inadequare claim
In future ... UKPC should select their legal very carefully because they are made to look idiots and their legal is as daft as a bog brush1 -
TJB93LJB said:The case has been struck out before hearing 😀😀😀😀
The reasoning makes for some amusing reading -
"Particulars of claim are entirely inadaquate"
attached the letter for amusement (let me know if I should delete, blurred out identifying sections)
This is case 1, still to hear back on the second identical case.Do I need to do anything further?
cannot thank you all enough. Another win against these charlatans. It's time the courts starting clamping down on these w*nkersPRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards